DILKHUSH BABEL vs UNION OF INDIA THROU. THE SEC. MINISTRY OF LAW AND JUSTCIE AND ORS — WP/6354/2026

Case under Customs Act, 1962 Section N.A. Disposed: Contested--Allowed To be withdrawn on 09th June 2026.

CNR: HCBM010145202026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

WP/8390/2026

Filing Date

24-03-2026

Registration No

WP/6354/2026

Registration Date

05-05-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM , HON'BLE JUSTICE ADVAIT M. SETHNA

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM , HON'BLE JUSTICE ADVAIT M. SETHNA

Bench Type

Division

Category

INDIRECT TAXES ( 17 )

Sub-Category

IMPORT POLICY ( 6 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

09th June 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed To be withdrawn

Acts & Sections

Customs Act, 1962 Section N.A

Petitioner(s)

DILKHUSH BABEL

Adv. Anjali Joshi

Respondent(s)

UNION OF INDIA THROU. THE SEC. MINISTRY OF LAW AND JUSTCIE AND ORS

JOINT COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (PREVENTIVE) RUMMAGING AND INTELLIGENCE DIVISION

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONE OF CUSTOMS, RUMMAGING AND INTELLIGENCE DIVISION

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, RECOVERY CELL, JODHPUR (PREVENTIVE)

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM , HON'BLE JUSTICE ADVAIT M. SETHNA

22-04-2026

OBJECTIONS TO BE REMOVED

09-06-2026

FRESH ADMISSION

Orders

09-06-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE ADVAIT M. SETHNA

Case Summary: The Bombay High Court dismissed Dilkhush Babel's writ petition (WP 6354/2026) against the Union of India and Customs authorities as withdrawn. The petitioner's counsel informed the court that the underlying grievance had been redressed by the concerned authorities during the petition's pendency, rendering it infructuous. The court accepted the withdrawal request and disposed of the petition accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The Bombay High Court dismissed Dilkhush Babel's writ petition (WP 6354/2026) against the Union of India and Customs authorities as withdrawn. The petitioner's counsel informed the court that the underlying grievance had been redressed by the concerned authorities during the petition's pendency, rendering it infructuous. The court accepted the withdrawal request and disposed of the petition accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case