ANIL LAXMAN BHADALE vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROU. ITS CHIEF SEC. AND ORS — WP/7019/2026

Case under Mah. Regional Town Planning Act Section NA. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.

CNR: HCBM010145192026

Next Hearing

16th June 2026

Filing Number

WP/8389/2026

Filing Date

24-03-2026

Registration No

WP/7019/2026

Registration Date

03-06-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAVINDRA V. GHUGE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY J. MANTRI

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAVINDRA V. GHUGE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY J. MANTRI

Bench Type

Division

Category

TOWN PLANNING ( 39 )

Sub-Category

TOWN PLANNING MATTERS INCLUDING MATTERS RELATING TO RESERVATION,TOWN PLANNING SCHEMES ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Acts & Sections

Mah. Regional Town Planning Act Section NA

Petitioner(s)

ANIL LAXMAN BHADALE

Adv. Pooja A Dongre

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROU. ITS CHIEF SEC. AND ORS

FURSUNGI-URULI DEVACHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL

THE CHIEF OFFICER, FURSUNGI-URULI DEVACHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAVINDRA V. GHUGE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY J. MANTRI

22-04-2026

OBJECTIONS TO BE REMOVED

Orders

08-05-2026
Shri. P. P. JADHAV, Registrar(Judl I)

The Writ Petition filed by Anil Laxman Bhadale against the State of Maharashtra and Fursungi-Uruli Devachi Municipal Council had all office objections removed on 08/05/2026. The petition was removed from the board and directed to the department for allotment of a final case number for substantive hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Writ Petition filed by Anil Laxman Bhadale against the State of Maharashtra and Fursungi-Uruli Devachi Municipal Council had all office objections removed on 08/05/2026. The petition was removed from the board and directed to the department for allotment of a final case number for substantive hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case