ASSOCIATION OF THE MANAGEMENT S OF AGRICULTURE AND ORS vs HIGHER AND TECHNICAL EDUCATUIB DEPT AND ORS — WP/5188/2026

Case under Mah. Agriculture Universities Act 1983 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 23rd April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM010145042026

Filing Number

WP/8380/2026

Filing Date

24-Mar-2026

Registration No

WP/5188/2026

Registration Date

17-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla , Hon'ble Justice Advait M. Sethna

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla , Hon'ble Justice Advait M. Sethna

Bench Type

Division

Category

EDUCATION ( 11 )

Sub-Category

ADMISSION ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

23-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 28-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Mah. Agriculture Universities Act 1983 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ASSOCIATION OF THE MANAGEMENT S OF AGRICULTURE AND ORS

    Adv. Sandeep Ramesh Waghmare

  2. 2.PROF KALLAPA SHANKAR BANDI, SECRETARY K K WAGH EDUCATION SOCIETY NASHIK

  3. 3.K K WAGH COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE THRO ITS PRINCIPAL DR SATISHKUMAR MURLIDHAR HADOLE

  4. 4.K K WAGH COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE BUSINESS MANAGEMENT NASHIK THRO ITS PRINCIPAL PRAVIN P JAGTAP

  5. 5.K K WAGH COLLEGE OF FOOD TECHNOLOGY NASHIK THRO ITS PRINCIPAL NITIN G DEVSHETE

  6. 6.K K WAGH COLLEGE OF HORTICULTURE NASHIK THRO ITS PRINCIPAL VIKAS S SANDHAN

  7. 7.K K WAGH COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURAL BIOTECHNOLOGY NASHIK THRO ITS PRINCIPAL NAGESHKUMAR S PACHPOR

  8. 8.K K WAGH COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY NASHIK THRO PRINCIPAL HEMANT V DESHMUKH

  9. 9.GRAMONNATI MANDALS COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE BUSINESS MANAGEMENT NARAYANGAON THRO PRIN MILIND BHUJBAL

  10. 10.SHRI SHIVAJI COLLEGE OF HORTICULTURE AMRAVATI THRO PRIN CHANDRASHEKHAR DESHMUKH

  11. 11.COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE, UMARKHED THRO JOINT SECRETARY SACHIN CHINTALE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.HIGHER AND TECHNICAL EDUCATUIB DEPT AND ORS

  2. 2.SOCIAL JUSTICE AND SPEICAL ASSISTANCE DEPARTMENT THRO ITS SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT MAHARASHTRA

  3. 3.UNION OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF SOCIAL JUSTICE AND EMPOWERMENT,DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL JUSTICE AND EMPOWER

    Adv. Mandar Limaye

  4. 4.TRIBAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT THRO ITS SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA

  5. 5.OTHER BACKWARD BAHUJAN WELFARE DEPARTMENT THRO ITS SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA

  6. 6.FINANCE DEPARTMENT, THRO ITS SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA

  7. 7.INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT THRO ITS SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA

  8. 8.THE STATE COMMON ENTRANCE TEST CELL GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA THRO ITS COMMISSIONER

  9. 9.AGRICULTURE, ANIMAL HUSBANDRY DAIRY DEVELOPMENT AND FISHERIES DEPARTMENT THRO ITS SECRETARY

  10. 10.MAHARASHTRA COUNCIL OF AGRICULTURAL EDUCATION AND RESEARCH (MCAER)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla,hon'ble Justice Advait M. SethnaView PDF

    Summary of WP/5188/2026 The Bombay High Court converted multiple consolidated writ petitions filed by educational institutions (diploma, professional, and agricultural colleges) seeking pending payments for scholarships, freeships, and reimbursements into representations. The court directed the state authorities to scrutinize these representations and hold hearings within five months, then determine eligibility and pay admissible amounts within four weeks thereafter, without expressing opinions on merits and reserving all parties' rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Apr-2026

    Fresh Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla , Hon'ble Justice Advait M. Sethna

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/5188/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of WP/5188/2026 The Bombay High Court converted multiple consolidated writ petitions filed by educational institutions (diploma, professional, and agricultural colleges) seeking pending payments for scholarships, freeships, and reimbursements into representations. The court directed the state authorities to scrutinize these representations and hold hearings within five months, then determine eligibility and pay admissible amounts within four weeks thereafter, without expressing opinions on merits and reserving all parties' rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case