TECHNOCRAFT INDUSTRIES INDIA LTD. AND ANR vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, LABOUR, INDUSTRIES AND ENERGY DEPT. AND ORS — WP/4127/2026
Case under M.r.t.u. & P.u.l.p. Act Section NA. Disposed: Contested--Rule Made Absolute on 23rd April 2026.
CNR: HCBM010144932026
Filing Number
WP/8371/2026
Filing Date
24-Mar-2026
Registration No
WP/4127/2026
Registration Date
27-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar
Bench Type
Single
Category
LABOUR MATTERS SINGLE BENCH ( 65 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS ( 13 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
23-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Rule Made Absolute
Last updated 28-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.TECHNOCRAFT INDUSTRIES INDIA LTD. AND ANR
Adv. TRIVENINATH RAMPRASAD YADAV
-
2.ATANU CHOUDHARY
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, LABOUR, INDUSTRIES AND ENERGY DEPT. AND ORS
-
2.PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, LABOUR DEPARTMENT, STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
-
3.COMMISSIONER OF LABOUR, MAHARASHTRA
-
4.NASHIK WORKERS UNION
Adv. Hosanna Fernandez
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Jun-2026
For Circulation
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar
-
23-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit BorkarView PDF
The Bombay High Court set aside the impugned order by consent of all parties in this writ petition filed by Technocraft Industries India Ltd. against the State of Maharashtra's Labour Department. The court made the rule absolute in terms of prayer clause "A," effectively granting the relief sought by the petitioner through a settlement between the parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit BorkarView PDF
-
02-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/4127/2026
The Bombay High Court set aside the impugned order by consent of all parties in this writ petition filed by Technocraft Industries India Ltd. against the State of Maharashtra's Labour Department. The court made the rule absolute in terms of prayer clause "A," effectively granting the relief sought by the petitioner through a settlement between the parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts