TASKEEN MOHAMMAD ASIF MOMIN AND ORS vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — ABA/778/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Next hearing: 20th April 2026.

Next hearing 20-Apr-2026

CNR: HCBM010144762026

Filing Number

ABA/6118/2026

Filing Date

24-Mar-2026

Registration No

ABA/778/2026

Registration Date

24-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice N. R. Borkar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice N. R. Borkar

Bench Type

Single

Category

BAIL ( 51 )

Sub-Category

Anticipatory ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 85,91,352,351(2),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.TASKEEN MOHAMMAD ASIF MOMIN AND ORS

    Adv. TUUSHAR SONAWANE

  2. 2.MOHMMAD ASIF MOHAMMAD USMAN MOMIN

  3. 3.KASSIF AHMAD MOHAMMAD ASIF MOMIN

  4. 4.YASHFEEN MOHAMMAD ASIF MOMIN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

  2. 2.TUBA YASEEN MOMIN

Case History

  1. 20-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 20-Apr-2026

    Due Admission - 1

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. R. Borkar

  3. 02-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. R. BorkarView PDF

    Summary The Bombay High Court adjourned the anticipatory bail application to 20.04.2026, granting interim protection to the applicants by directing that they shall not be arrested till the next date. The APP sought time for further instructions, and liberty was granted to the respondent to file a reply before the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 02-Apr-2026

    Fresh Admission (Anticipatory Bail Applications)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. R. Borkar

  5. 26-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. R. BorkarView PDF

  6. 26-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 24-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. ABA/778/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Bombay High Court adjourned the anticipatory bail application to 20.04.2026, granting interim protection to the applicants by directing that they shall not be arrested till the next date. The APP sought time for further instructions, and liberty was granted to the respondent to file a reply before the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case