RAVINDRA MAHADU ALIAS MADHAVRAO CHANDWADKAR vs BABABAI BHIMA JADHAV AND ORS — HCBM10144652026

Case under C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order). Next hearing: 08th June 2026.

Next hearing 08-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM010144652026

Filing Number

WP/8351/2026

Filing Date

24-Mar-2026

Judge

Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)

Coram

Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)

Bench Type

Single

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )

Sub-Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 11 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAVINDRA MAHADU ALIAS MADHAVRAO CHANDWADKAR

    Adv. Rahul Damodar Motkari

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BABABAI BHIMA JADHAV AND ORS

  2. 2.SANGITA MADHUKAR BHALERAO

  3. 3.MALAN ARUN SONAWANE

  4. 4.DEVIDAS UTTAM RUPWATE

  5. 5.ROHIDAS UTTAM RUPWATE

  6. 6.UTTAM KACHARU RUPWATE

Case History

  1. 08-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-Jun-2026

    Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)View PDF

    In Writ Petition (Stamp) No. 8351 of 2026, the Bombay High Court Registrar (Judicial-I) found that petitioner Ravindra Mahadu Chandwadkar and his advocate failed to remove office objections after initial notification on 23rd/24th April 2026. Rather than refuse registration outright, the Court granted a two-week extension to cure the defects. If objections remain unremoved after this period, registration will be refused under Rule 3(iii) of Chapter XVII of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Apr-2026

    Objections To Be Removed

    Assistant Registrar

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

In Writ Petition (Stamp) No. 8351 of 2026, the Bombay High Court Registrar (Judicial-I) found that petitioner Ravindra Mahadu Chandwadkar and his advocate failed to remove office objections after initial notification on 23rd/24th April 2026. Rather than refuse registration outright, the Court granted a two-week extension to cure the defects. If objections remain unremoved after this period, registration will be refused under Rule 3(iii) of Chapter XVII of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case