CHINDHU LAXMAN WAGH AND ORS vs ANANDA KONDAJI WAGH AND ORS — HCBM10144622026
Case under Mamlatdars Courts Act 1906. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM010144622026
Next Hearing
08th June 2026
Filing Number
WP/8350/2026
Filing Date
24-03-2026
Judge
Shri. P. P. JADHAV, Registrar(Judl I)
Coram
Shri. P. P. JADHAV, Registrar(Judl I)
Bench Type
Single
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )
Sub-Category
Orders passed by Quasi Judicial Authority Other than Labour and Industrial Court ( 105 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
CHINDHU LAXMAN WAGH AND ORS
Adv. Rahul Damodar Motkari
KACHRU NIVRUTI WAGH
BHAUSAHEB NIVRUTI WAGH
Respondent(s)
ANANDA KONDAJI WAGH AND ORS
THE TAHSILDAR, SINNAR
THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR ALIAS SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER
Hearing History
Judge: Shri. P. P. JADHAV, Registrar(Judl I)
OBJECTIONS TO BE REMOVED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-04-2026 | OBJECTIONS TO BE REMOVED |
Orders
Case Summary: Writ Petition (Stamp) No. 8350 of 2026 was adjourned. The petitioners and their advocate failed to remove office objections by the April 23-24, 2026 deadline. Rather than outright refusing registration, the Registrar granted a two-week extension to cure the deficiencies; failure to comply will result in rejection of the petition under Rule 3(iii) of Chapter XVII, Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Writ Petition (Stamp) No. 8350 of 2026 was adjourned. The petitioners and their advocate failed to remove office objections by the April 23-24, 2026 deadline. Rather than outright refusing registration, the Registrar granted a two-week extension to cure the deficiencies; failure to comply will result in rejection of the petition under Rule 3(iii) of Chapter XVII, Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts