SMITA ANUP BARBARE vs ANUP GAJANAN BARBARE — HCBM10144442026
Case under Family Court Act. Status: For Orders (Objection Not Removed). Next hearing: 08th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM010144442026
Filing Number
WP/8337/2026
Filing Date
24-Mar-2026
Judge
Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)
Coram
Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)
Bench Type
Single
Category
FAMILY LAW ( 16 )
Sub-Category
MAINTENANCE ( 6 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SMITA ANUP BARBARE
Adv. Disha Nidre
Respondent(s)
-
1.ANUP GAJANAN BARBARE
Case History
-
08-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
08-Jun-2026
Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)View PDF
Case Summary: SMITA ANUP BARBARE v. ANUP GAJANAN BARBARE Writ Petition (Stamp) No. 8337 of 2026 – Bombay High Court The petitioner's writ petition was notified on 23rd/24th April 2026 to remove office objections but failed to do so. Rather than immediately refusing registration under Rule 3(iii) of Chapter XVII of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960, the Registrar granted a final two-week extension to remove the objections, with a warning that failure to comply will result in refusal of registration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Apr-2026
Objections To Be Removed
Assistant Registrar
-
24-Mar-2026
Case filed
Case Summary: SMITA ANUP BARBARE v. ANUP GAJANAN BARBARE Writ Petition (Stamp) No. 8337 of 2026 – Bombay High Court The petitioner's writ petition was notified on 23rd/24th April 2026 to remove office objections but failed to do so. Rather than immediately refusing registration under Rule 3(iii) of Chapter XVII of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960, the Registrar granted a final two-week extension to remove the objections, with a warning that failure to comply will result in refusal of registration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts