ANIL DHONDIRAM GAIKWAD vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR PRIN. SEC. HOME (STATE EXCISE) DEPT. AND ORS — WP/4564/2026

Case under Bombay Prohibition Act Section NA. Next hearing: 01st July 2026.

CNR: HCBM010144092026

Next Hearing

01st July 2026

Filing Number

WP/8312/2026

Filing Date

24-03-2026

Registration No

WP/4564/2026

Registration Date

08-04-2026

Judge

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHYAM C. CHANDAK

Coram

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHYAM C. CHANDAK

Bench Type

Division

Category

EXCISE ( 36 )

Sub-Category

State Excise Department ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Acts & Sections

Bombay Prohibition Act Section NA

Petitioner(s)

ANIL DHONDIRAM GAIKWAD

Adv. VINAYAK R SALOKHE

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR PRIN. SEC. HOME (STATE EXCISE) DEPT. AND ORS

THE COMMISSIONER OF STATE EXCISE MAHARASHTRA STATE

THE COLLECTOR OF PUNE STATE EXCISE DEPARTMENT

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHYAM C. CHANDAK

17-04-2026

FRESH ADMISSION

01-07-2026

FRESH ADMISSION

Orders

17-04-2026
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHYAM C. CHANDAK

Case Summary: WP 4564/2026 - Anil Dhondiram Gaikwad v. State of Maharashtra The Bombay High Court adjourned the case due to insufficient court time on 17th April 2026, with the matter stood over to 1st July 2026. Any interim or ad-interim relief previously granted continues to remain in effect until the next hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP 4564/2026 - Anil Dhondiram Gaikwad v. State of Maharashtra The Bombay High Court adjourned the case due to insufficient court time on 17th April 2026, with the matter stood over to 1st July 2026. Any interim or ad-interim relief previously granted continues to remain in effect until the next hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case