SIDDHESHWAR SHIKSHAN MANDAL THRU TRUSTEES AND ORS vs SATISH THORAT AND ORS — HCBM10142432026
Case under Bombay Public Trust Act. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM010142432026
Next Hearing
08th June 2026
Filing Number
WP/8230/2026
Filing Date
23-03-2026
Judge
Shri. P. P. JADHAV, Registrar(Judl I)
Coram
Shri. P. P. JADHAV, Registrar(Judl I)
Bench Type
Single
Category
RELIGIOUS/CHARITABLE ENDOWMWNTS AND PUBLIC TRUST ( 33 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS ( 99 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SIDDHESHWAR SHIKSHAN MANDAL THRU TRUSTEES AND ORS
Adv. P B GUJAR
BALBHIM RAMCHANDRA SHITOLE
DHYANDEO DAGADU SHINDE
SHANKAR MARUTI SHELAR
SAMPAT BABURAO SHITOLE
BABURAO TUKARAM KAPRE
RAJENDRA MADHAVRAO SHINDE
MOHAN SARJERAO THORAT
SANTOSH CHANDRAKANT KADAM
PRASANNA RAMESH KAPRE
RAJESH BAPURAO NATU
GOVIND BABURAO SHENDGE
NANDKUMAR MANIK VISHWASE
Respondent(s)
SATISH THORAT AND ORS
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRO OFFICE OF THE GOVERNMENT PLEADER
ASSISTANT CHARITY COMMISSIONER-4,PUNE DIVISION, PUNE
Hearing History
Judge: Shri. P. P. JADHAV, Registrar(Judl I)
OBJECTIONS TO BE REMOVED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-04-2026 | OBJECTIONS TO BE REMOVED |
Orders
Case Summary: In Writ Petition (Stamp) No. 8230 of 2026 before the Bombay High Court, the petitioners failed to remove office objections after notification on 23rd/24th April 2026. Rather than straightaway refusing registration as per Rule 3 sub-rule (iii) of Chapter XVII of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960, the Registrar (Judicial-I) granted the petitioners and their advocate an additional two weeks to cure the defects. If office objections remain unremoved within this period, the petition will face refusal of registration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: In Writ Petition (Stamp) No. 8230 of 2026 before the Bombay High Court, the petitioners failed to remove office objections after notification on 23rd/24th April 2026. Rather than straightaway refusing registration as per Rule 3 sub-rule (iii) of Chapter XVII of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960, the Registrar (Judicial-I) granted the petitioners and their advocate an additional two weeks to cure the defects. If office objections remain unremoved within this period, the petition will face refusal of registration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts