SIDDHESHWAR SHIKSHAN MANDAL PIMPALGAON THRU TRUSTEES AND ORS vs SATISH THORAT ANR ORS — HCBM10142382026
Case under Bombay Public Trust Act. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM010142382026
Next Hearing
08th June 2026
Filing Number
WP/8227/2026
Filing Date
23-03-2026
Judge
Shri. P. P. JADHAV, Registrar(Judl I)
Coram
Shri. P. P. JADHAV, Registrar(Judl I)
Bench Type
Single
Category
RELIGIOUS/CHARITABLE ENDOWMWNTS AND PUBLIC TRUST ( 33 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS ( 99 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SIDDHESHWAR SHIKSHAN MANDAL PIMPALGAON THRU TRUSTEES AND ORS
Adv. P B GUJAR
BALBHIM RAMCHANDRA SHITOLE
DHYANDEO DAGADU SHINDE
SHANKAR MARUTI SHELAR
SAMPAT BABURAO SHITOLE
BABURAO TUKARAM KAPRE
RAJENDRA MADHAVRAO SHINDE
MOHAN SARJERAO THORAT
SANTOSH CHANDRAKANT KADAM
PRASANNA RAMESH KAPRE
RAJESH BAPURAO NATU
GOVIND BABURAO SHENDGE
NANDKUMAR MANIK VISHWASE
Respondent(s)
SATISH THORAT ANR ORS
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRO OFFICE OF THE GOVERNMENT PLEADER
ASSISTANT CHARITY COMMISSIONER-4,PUNE DIVISION, PUNE
Hearing History
Judge: Shri. P. P. JADHAV, Registrar(Judl I)
OBJECTIONS TO BE REMOVED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-04-2026 | OBJECTIONS TO BE REMOVED |
Orders
Case Summary In Writ Petition (Stamp) No. 8227 of 2026 before the Bombay High Court, the petitioners failed to remove office objections within the prescribed timeframe after notification on 23rd/24th April 2026. Rather than immediately refusing registration, the Registrar (Judicial-I) granted petitioners and their advocate a two-week extension to cure the defects. If objections remain unremoved after this period, the petition will be rejected under Rule 3 sub-rule (iii) of Chapter XVII of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary In Writ Petition (Stamp) No. 8227 of 2026 before the Bombay High Court, the petitioners failed to remove office objections within the prescribed timeframe after notification on 23rd/24th April 2026. Rather than immediately refusing registration, the Registrar (Judicial-I) granted petitioners and their advocate a two-week extension to cure the defects. If objections remain unremoved after this period, the petition will be rejected under Rule 3 sub-rule (iii) of Chapter XVII of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts