HARI NAIR vs EXECUTIVE ENGINEER AND ORS — HCBM10142082026

Case under Electricity (Supply) Act. Status: For Orders (Objection Not Removed). Next hearing: 19th June 2026.

For Orders (Objection Not Removed) Next hearing 19-Jun-2026 this date has passed

CNR: HCBM010142082026

Filing Number

WP/8206/2026

Filing Date

23-Mar-2026

Judge

Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)

Coram

Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)

Bench Type

Division

Category

ELECTRICITY ( 13 )

Sub-Category

MAH. ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION ( 7 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Electricity (Supply) Act

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HARI NAIR

    Adv. Onkar Gupte

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.EXECUTIVE ENGINEER AND ORS

  2. 2.ASSISTANT ENGINEER MAHARASHTRA STATE ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION CO. LTD.

  3. 3.DEPUTY CHIEF FIRE OFFICER

  4. 4.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR GP

  5. 5.RAJESH SABADRA

Case History

  1. 19-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 19-Jun-2026

    For Orders (Objection Not Removed)

    Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)

  3. 08-May-2026

    Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)View PDF

    In Writ Petition No. 8206 of 2026, the Bombay High Court's Registrar (Judicial-I) granted petitioner Hari Nair a final opportunity of two weeks (excluding Summer Vacation) to remove office objections that had been previously notified on 22 April 2026. The petitioner and his advocate had initially failed to cure the defects. The court warned that if objections remain unremoved after this grace period, the petition will be rejected under Rule 3 sub-rule (iii) of Chapter XVII of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 22-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 23-Mar-2026

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

In Writ Petition No. 8206 of 2026, the Bombay High Court's Registrar (Judicial-I) granted petitioner Hari Nair a final opportunity of two weeks (excluding Summer Vacation) to remove office objections that had been previously notified on 22 April 2026. The petitioner and his advocate had initially failed to cure the defects. The court warned that if objections remain unremoved after this grace period, the petition will be rejected under Rule 3 sub-rule (iii) of Chapter XVII of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case