HARI NAIR vs EXECUTIVE ENGINEER AND ORS — HCBM10142082026

Case under Electricity (supply) Act Section ---. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.

CNR: HCBM010142082026

Next Hearing

19th June 2026

Filing Number

WP/8206/2026

Filing Date

23-03-2026

Judge

Shri. P. P. JADHAV, Registrar(Judl I)

Coram

Shri. P. P. JADHAV, Registrar(Judl I)

Bench Type

Division

Category

ELECTRICITY ( 13 )

Sub-Category

MAH. ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION ( 7 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Acts & Sections

ELECTRICITY (SUPPLY) ACT Section ---

Petitioner(s)

HARI NAIR

Adv. Onkar Gupte

Respondent(s)

EXECUTIVE ENGINEER AND ORS

ASSISTANT ENGINEER MAHARASHTRA STATE ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION CO. LTD.

DEPUTY CHIEF FIRE OFFICER

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR GP

RAJESH SABADRA

Hearing History

Judge: Shri. P. P. JADHAV, Registrar(Judl I)

22-04-2026

OBJECTIONS TO BE REMOVED

19-06-2026

FOR ORDERS (OBJECTION NOT REMOVED)

Orders

08-05-2026
Shri. P. P. JADHAV, Registrar(Judl I)

In Writ Petition No. 8206 of 2026, the Bombay High Court's Registrar (Judicial-I) granted petitioner Hari Nair a final opportunity of two weeks (excluding Summer Vacation) to remove office objections that had been previously notified on 22 April 2026. The petitioner and his advocate had initially failed to cure the defects. The court warned that if objections remain unremoved after this grace period, the petition will be rejected under Rule 3 sub-rule (iii) of Chapter XVII of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

In Writ Petition No. 8206 of 2026, the Bombay High Court's Registrar (Judicial-I) granted petitioner Hari Nair a final opportunity of two weeks (excluding Summer Vacation) to remove office objections that had been previously notified on 22 April 2026. The petitioner and his advocate had initially failed to cure the defects. The court warned that if objections remain unremoved after this grace period, the petition will be rejected under Rule 3 sub-rule (iii) of Chapter XVII of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case