SANJAY K JADHAV vs M/S. ESSAR TRADERS AND ORS — HCBM10141412026

Case under Industrial Dispute Act, 1947. Status: For Orders (Objection Not Removed). Next hearing: 08th June 2026.

For Orders (Objection Not Removed) Next hearing 08-Jun-2026 this date has passed

CNR: HCBM010141412026

Filing Number

WP/8164/2026

Filing Date

23-Mar-2026

Judge

Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)

Coram

Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)

Bench Type

Single

Category

LABOUR MATTERS DB ( 19 )

Sub-Category

GRATUITY ( 7 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Industrial Dispute Act, 1947

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SANJAY K JADHAV

    Adv. Adv Shraddha Vavhal

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M/S. ESSAR TRADERS AND ORS

  2. 2.M/S. ESSAR DIAMONDS

  3. 3.SAMIR SHASHIKANT MEHTA (PARTNER)

  4. 4.RAJIV SURYAKANT SHAH (PARTNER)

Case History

  1. 08-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-Jun-2026

    Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)View PDF

    Case Summary: Writ Petition No. 8164 of 2026 filed by Sanjay K Jadhav against M/S. Essar Traders and others was adjourned. The petitioner and advocate failed to remove office objections after initial notification on 23rd/24th April 2026. Rather than refuse registration outright, the Registrar (Judicial-I) granted a two-week extension to cure the defects. If office objections remain unresolved, the petition will be refused registration under Rule 3(iii) of Chapter XVII, Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Apr-2026

    Objections To Be Removed

    Assistant Registrar

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Writ Petition No. 8164 of 2026 filed by Sanjay K Jadhav against M/S. Essar Traders and others was adjourned. The petitioner and advocate failed to remove office objections after initial notification on 23rd/24th April 2026. Rather than refuse registration outright, the Registrar (Judicial-I) granted a two-week extension to cure the defects. If office objections remain unresolved, the petition will be refused registration under Rule 3(iii) of Chapter XVII, Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case