SHREERANG SHANKAR KADAM SHRI. S.V.PITRE vs RAYAT SHIKSHAN SANSTHA AND ORS. — WP/7029/2002

Case under Other Act. Next hearing: 30th June 2026.

Next hearing 30-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM010141352002

Filing Number

WP/30741/2002

Filing Date

13-Aug-2002

Registration No

WP/7029/2002

Registration Date

05-Dec-2002

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. Sathaye

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. Sathaye

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Other Act

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHREERANG SHANKAR KADAM SHRI. S.V.PITRE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAYAT SHIKSHAN SANSTHA AND ORS.

    Adv. FOR RESP.NO.4,SHRI.DEEPAK.R.MORE,FOR R.NO.1,ADDL.GOVT.PLEADER 1123

  2. 2.SADHANA PRATHAMIK VIDYA MANDIR

  3. 3.DY. DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION

  4. 4.SHIKSHAN PRAMUKH PUNE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION

  5. 5.SMT SARALA HARIPANT RANBHISE

  6. 6.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Case History

  1. 30-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 30-Jun-2026

    For Orders (Regular)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. Sathaye

  3. 09-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. SathayeView PDF

    Case Summary: In WP 7029/2002 before the Bombay High Court, the petition filed by Shreerang Shankar Kadam against Rayat Shikshan Sanstha and others was adjourned (stood over) to 30.06.2026. The petitioner's counsel sought accommodation in hearing dates, and the respondent's counsel informed the court that the educational institution wished to engage another advocate, supported by a WhatsApp communication screenshot from the legal officer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 30-Jun-2003

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 13-Aug-2002

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/7029/2002

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: In WP 7029/2002 before the Bombay High Court, the petition filed by Shreerang Shankar Kadam against Rayat Shikshan Sanstha and others was adjourned (stood over) to 30.06.2026. The petitioner's counsel sought accommodation in hearing dates, and the respondent's counsel informed the court that the educational institution wished to engage another advocate, supported by a WhatsApp communication screenshot from the legal officer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case