ENZENE BIOSCIENCES LIMITED vs BHARATIYA KAMGAR SENA THR ITS CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY AND ANR — HCBM10141242026

Case under Industrial Dispute Act, 1947. Status: For Orders (Objection Not Removed). Next hearing: 18th June 2026.

For Orders (Objection Not Removed) Next hearing 18-Jun-2026 this date has passed

CNR: HCBM010141242026

Filing Number

WP/8154/2026

Filing Date

23-Mar-2026

Judge

Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)

Coram

Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)

Bench Type

Single

Category

LABOUR MATTERS SINGLE BENCH ( 65 )

Sub-Category

CONTRACT LABOUR ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Industrial Dispute Act, 1947

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ENZENE BIOSCIENCES LIMITED

    Adv. CHETAN ARVIND ALAI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BHARATIYA KAMGAR SENA THR ITS CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY AND ANR

  2. 2.KUNAL FACILITIES INDIA PVT. LTD THR. ITS AUTHORISED REPRESENTATIVE

Case History

  1. 18-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 18-Jun-2026

    For Orders (Objection Not Removed)

    Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)

  3. 07-May-2026

    Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)View PDF

    Case Summary: Enzene Biosciences Limited's Writ Petition (Stamp) No. 8154 of 2026 was notified on 21st April 2026 for removal of office objections. The petitioner and advocate failed to remove these objections. The Bombay High Court Registrar granted a final two-week extension (excluding summer vacation) to cure the defects, warning that failure to comply would result in refusal of registration under Rule 3(iii) of Chapter XVII of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 21-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 23-Mar-2026

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Enzene Biosciences Limited's Writ Petition (Stamp) No. 8154 of 2026 was notified on 21st April 2026 for removal of office objections. The petitioner and advocate failed to remove these objections. The Bombay High Court Registrar granted a final two-week extension (excluding summer vacation) to cure the defects, warning that failure to comply would result in refusal of registration under Rule 3(iii) of Chapter XVII of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case