ENZENE BIOSCIENCES LIMITED THR. ITS AUTHORISED REPRESENTATIVE NIYAJ B. JAMADAR vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR GOVERNMENT PLEADER AND ORS — HCBM10141192026
Case under Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 Section ---. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM010141192026
Next Hearing
18th June 2026
Filing Number
WP/8152/2026
Filing Date
23-03-2026
Judge
Shri. P. P. JADHAV, Registrar(Judl I)
Coram
Shri. P. P. JADHAV, Registrar(Judl I)
Bench Type
Division
Category
LABOUR MATTERS DB ( 19 )
Sub-Category
CONTRACT LABOUR ( 4 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ENZENE BIOSCIENCES LIMITED THR. ITS AUTHORISED REPRESENTATIVE NIYAJ B. JAMADAR
Adv. CHETAN ARVIND ALAI
Respondent(s)
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR GOVERNMENT PLEADER AND ORS
ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF LABOUR PUNE
CONCILIATION OFFICER DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF LABOUR PUNE
BHARATIYA KAMAGAR SENA (PUNE DIVISION) THR. ITS AUTHO. REPRESENTATIVE
Hearing History
Judge: Shri. P. P. JADHAV, Registrar(Judl I)
OBJECTIONS TO BE REMOVED
FOR ORDERS (OBJECTION NOT REMOVED)
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 21-04-2026 | OBJECTIONS TO BE REMOVED |
| 18-06-2026 | FOR ORDERS (OBJECTION NOT REMOVED) |
Orders
Case Summary: Writ Petition No. 8152 of 2026 by Enzene Biosciences Limited against the State of Maharashtra and labour officials was adjourned. The petitioner failed to remove office objections by the April 21, 2026 deadline. The Registrar granted a final two-week extension (excluding summer vacation) to cure the defects; failure to comply will result in refusal of registration under Rule 3(iii) of Chapter XVII, Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Writ Petition No. 8152 of 2026 by Enzene Biosciences Limited against the State of Maharashtra and labour officials was adjourned. The petitioner failed to remove office objections by the April 21, 2026 deadline. The Registrar granted a final two-week extension (excluding summer vacation) to cure the defects; failure to comply will result in refusal of registration under Rule 3(iii) of Chapter XVII, Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts