ENZENE BIOSCIENCES LIMITED THR. ITS AUTHORISED REPRESENTATIVE NIYAJ B. JAMADAR vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR GOVERNMENT PLEADER AND ORS — HCBM10141192026
Case under Industrial Dispute Act, 1947. Status: For Orders (Objection Not Removed). Next hearing: 18th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM010141192026
Filing Number
WP/8152/2026
Filing Date
23-Mar-2026
Judge
Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)
Coram
Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)
Bench Type
Division
Category
LABOUR MATTERS DB ( 19 )
Sub-Category
CONTRACT LABOUR ( 4 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 11-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ENZENE BIOSCIENCES LIMITED THR. ITS AUTHORISED REPRESENTATIVE NIYAJ B. JAMADAR
Adv. CHETAN ARVIND ALAI
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR GOVERNMENT PLEADER AND ORS
-
2.ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF LABOUR PUNE
-
3.CONCILIATION OFFICER DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF LABOUR PUNE
-
4.BHARATIYA KAMAGAR SENA (PUNE DIVISION) THR. ITS AUTHO. REPRESENTATIVE
Case History
-
18-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
18-Jun-2026
For Orders (Objection Not Removed)
Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)
-
07-May-2026
Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)View PDF
Case Summary: Writ Petition No. 8152 of 2026 by Enzene Biosciences Limited against the State of Maharashtra and labour officials was adjourned. The petitioner failed to remove office objections by the April 21, 2026 deadline. The Registrar granted a final two-week extension (excluding summer vacation) to cure the defects; failure to comply will result in refusal of registration under Rule 3(iii) of Chapter XVII, Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
21-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Mar-2026
Case filed
Case Summary: Writ Petition No. 8152 of 2026 by Enzene Biosciences Limited against the State of Maharashtra and labour officials was adjourned. The petitioner failed to remove office objections by the April 21, 2026 deadline. The Registrar granted a final two-week extension (excluding summer vacation) to cure the defects; failure to comply will result in refusal of registration under Rule 3(iii) of Chapter XVII, Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts