APEEJAY SURENDRA PARK HOTELS LIMITED vs NAVI MUMBAI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ORS Advocate - ROHIT SAKHADEO — WP/3806/2026

Case under Mah. Muncipalties Act Section NA. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM010140992026

Filing Number

WP/8140/2026

Filing Date

23-Mar-2026

Registration No

WP/3806/2026

Registration Date

24-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shyam C. Chandak

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shyam C. Chandak

Bench Type

Division

Category

LOCAL BODY MATTERS OTHER THAN ELECTION, LABOUR AND SERVICE ( 61 )

Sub-Category

Municipal Corporation ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 03-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Mah. Muncipalties Act Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.APEEJAY SURENDRA PARK HOTELS LIMITED

    Adv. Rahul P Jain

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NAVI MUMBAI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ORS Advocate - ROHIT SAKHADEO

  2. 2.THE MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER NAVI MUMBAI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION

  3. 3.DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, TAX DEPARTMENT, NAVI MUMBAI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION

    Adv. ROHIT SAKHADEO

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik,hon'ble Shri Justice Shyam C. ChandakView PDF

    The Bombay High Court allowed Apeejay Surendra Park Hotels' petition against Navi Mumbai Municipal Corporation's property tax reassessment of Rs. 5,87,42,960, finding the penalty was levied without granting a fair hearing despite the petitioner's request for more time. The court directed the corporation to accept the petitioner's detailed representation within two weeks and decide it within four weeks with proper hearing, while restraining coercive action; the petitioner agreed to deposit Rs. 1 crore pending final decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shyam C. Chandak

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik,hon'ble Shri Justice Shyam C. ChandakView PDF

  5. 24-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 23-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/3806/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court allowed Apeejay Surendra Park Hotels' petition against Navi Mumbai Municipal Corporation's property tax reassessment of Rs. 5,87,42,960, finding the penalty was levied without granting a fair hearing despite the petitioner's request for more time. The court directed the corporation to accept the petitioner's detailed representation within two weeks and decide it within four weeks with proper hearing, while restraining coercive action; the petitioner agreed to deposit Rs. 1 crore pending final decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case