AASTHA ENTERPRISES vs THE UNION OF INDIA THR THE REVENUE SECRETARY AND ORS — HCBM10140872026
Case under Central Goods and Services Tax Act,2017. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM010140872026
Next Hearing
08th June 2026
Filing Number
WP/8133/2026
Filing Date
23-03-2026
Judge
Shri. P. P. JADHAV, Registrar(Judl I)
Coram
Shri. P. P. JADHAV, Registrar(Judl I)
Bench Type
Division
Category
INDIRECT TAXES ( 17 )
Sub-Category
GST Goods and Services Tax ( 100 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
AASTHA ENTERPRISES
Adv. C B Thakar
Respondent(s)
THE UNION OF INDIA THR THE REVENUE SECRETARY AND ORS
ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER CGST AND C EX THANE AUDIT
ADDITIONAL/JOINT COMMISSIONER CGST AND C EX THANE RURAL
Hearing History
Judge: Shri. P. P. JADHAV, Registrar(Judl I)
OBJECTIONS TO BE REMOVED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-04-2026 | OBJECTIONS TO BE REMOVED |
Orders
Summary: Aastha Enterprises' Writ Petition (Stamp) No. 8133 of 2026 against the Union of India and CGST officials was notified for removal of office objections on 23rd-24th April 2026, but the petitioner and advocate failed to comply. Rather than immediately refusing registration under Rule 3(iii) of Chapter XVII of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960, the Registrar (Judicial-I) granted a second opportunity. The case was adjourned with two weeks granted to remove office objections, failing which registration will be refused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: Aastha Enterprises' Writ Petition (Stamp) No. 8133 of 2026 against the Union of India and CGST officials was notified for removal of office objections on 23rd-24th April 2026, but the petitioner and advocate failed to comply. Rather than immediately refusing registration under Rule 3(iii) of Chapter XVII of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960, the Registrar (Judicial-I) granted a second opportunity. The case was adjourned with two weeks granted to remove office objections, failing which registration will be refused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts