RUSKAR ANIS PATEL AND ORS vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS. — HCBM10140732026
Case under Right of Persons with Disabilities Act. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM010140732026
Next Hearing
19th June 2026
Filing Number
WP/8126/2026
Filing Date
23-03-2026
Judge
Shri. P. P. JADHAV, Registrar(Judl I)
Coram
Shri. P. P. JADHAV, Registrar(Judl I)
Bench Type
Division
Category
MAT ( 35 )
Sub-Category
OTHER ( 99 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RUSKAR ANIS PATEL AND ORS
Adv. SACHIN A AMBULKAR
SHIVAJI MANIKRAO WANE
ASHWIN GULAB PARDHI
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRO THE SECRETARY
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRO THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRO THE SECRETARY, PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES WELFARE DEPARTMENT
MAHARASHTRA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION THRO THE SECRETARY
PRATIK KUBER SHINDE
Hearing History
Judge: Shri. P. P. JADHAV, Registrar(Judl I)
OBJECTIONS TO BE REMOVED
FOR ORDERS (OBJECTION NOT REMOVED)
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 22-04-2026 | OBJECTIONS TO BE REMOVED |
| 19-06-2026 | FOR ORDERS (OBJECTION NOT REMOVED) |
Orders
Case Summary: Writ Petition No. 8126 of 2026 was adjourned by the Bombay High Court on 08/05/2026. The petitioners and their advocate failed to remove office objections after being notified on 22 April 2026. The Registrar (Judicial-I) granted a final two-week extension (excluding summer vacation) to cure the defects, with warning that failure to comply will result in refusal of registration under Rule 3(iii) of Chapter XVII of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Writ Petition No. 8126 of 2026 was adjourned by the Bombay High Court on 08/05/2026. The petitioners and their advocate failed to remove office objections after being notified on 22 April 2026. The Registrar (Judicial-I) granted a final two-week extension (excluding summer vacation) to cure the defects, with warning that failure to comply will result in refusal of registration under Rule 3(iii) of Chapter XVII of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts