RUSKAR ANIS PATEL AND ORS vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS. — HCBM10140732026
Case under Right of Persons with Disabilities Act. Status: For Orders (Objection Not Removed). Next hearing: 19th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM010140732026
Filing Number
WP/8126/2026
Filing Date
23-Mar-2026
Judge
Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)
Coram
Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)
Bench Type
Division
Category
MAT ( 35 )
Sub-Category
OTHER ( 99 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 11-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RUSKAR ANIS PATEL AND ORS
Adv. SACHIN A AMBULKAR
-
2.SHIVAJI MANIKRAO WANE
-
3.ASHWIN GULAB PARDHI
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.
-
2.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRO THE SECRETARY
-
3.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRO THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY
-
4.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRO THE SECRETARY, PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES WELFARE DEPARTMENT
-
5.MAHARASHTRA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION THRO THE SECRETARY
-
6.PRATIK KUBER SHINDE
Case History
-
19-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
19-Jun-2026
For Orders (Objection Not Removed)
Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)
-
08-May-2026
Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)View PDF
Case Summary: Writ Petition No. 8126 of 2026 was adjourned by the Bombay High Court on 08/05/2026. The petitioners and their advocate failed to remove office objections after being notified on 22 April 2026. The Registrar (Judicial-I) granted a final two-week extension (excluding summer vacation) to cure the defects, with warning that failure to comply will result in refusal of registration under Rule 3(iii) of Chapter XVII of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
22-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Mar-2026
Case filed
Case Summary: Writ Petition No. 8126 of 2026 was adjourned by the Bombay High Court on 08/05/2026. The petitioners and their advocate failed to remove office objections after being notified on 22 April 2026. The Registrar (Judicial-I) granted a final two-week extension (excluding summer vacation) to cure the defects, with warning that failure to comply will result in refusal of registration under Rule 3(iii) of Chapter XVII of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts