RADHIKA MIRANI vs KAMAL MIRANI — HCBM10140592026

Case under Family Court Act. Status: For Orders (Objection Not Removed). Next hearing: 18th June 2026.

For Orders (Objection Not Removed) Next hearing 18-Jun-2026 this date has passed

CNR: HCBM010140592026

Filing Number

WP/8120/2026

Filing Date

23-Mar-2026

Judge

Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)

Coram

Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)

Bench Type

Single

Category

FAMILY LAW ( 16 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS ( 99 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Family Court Act

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RADHIKA MIRANI

    Adv. Rimpal Trivedi

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KAMAL MIRANI

Case History

  1. 18-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 18-Jun-2026

    For Orders (Objection Not Removed)

    Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)

  3. 07-May-2026

    Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)View PDF

    Case Summary: Radhika Mirani v. Kamal Mirani The Bombay High Court's Registrar (Judicial-I) adjourned Writ Petition (Stamp) No. 8120 of 2026 on 07/05/2026. The petitioner and advocate had failed to remove office objections after initial notification on 21st April 2026. The court granted a final two-week extension (excluding summer vacation) to cure the defects; failure to comply will result in refusal of registration under Rule 3(iii), Chapter XVII of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 21-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 23-Mar-2026

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Radhika Mirani v. Kamal Mirani The Bombay High Court's Registrar (Judicial-I) adjourned Writ Petition (Stamp) No. 8120 of 2026 on 07/05/2026. The petitioner and advocate had failed to remove office objections after initial notification on 21st April 2026. The court granted a final two-week extension (excluding summer vacation) to cure the defects; failure to comply will result in refusal of registration under Rule 3(iii), Chapter XVII of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case