MR. ALNESH AKIL SOMJI PARTNER OF M/S SAI ENTERPRISES vs SHRI VILAS GANPAT MANORE (PARTNER OF M/S SAI ENTERPRISES — ARP/73/2026
Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 Section 11. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 23rd April 2026.
CNR: HCBM010139812026
e-Filing Number
18-03-2026
Filing Number
ARP/8061/2026
Filing Date
18-Mar-2026
Registration No
ARP/73/2026
Registration Date
15-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain
Bench Type
Single
Category
ARBITRATION ( 4 )
Sub-Category
APPOINTMENT OF ARBITRATORS ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
23-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 02-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MR. ALNESH AKIL SOMJI PARTNER OF M/S SAI ENTERPRISES
Adv. Ronak Utagikar
Respondent(s)
-
1.SHRI VILAS GANPAT MANORE (PARTNER OF M/S SAI ENTERPRISES
-
2.SHRI HANIF GULAMALI SOMJI PARTNER OF M/S SAI ENTERPRISES
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
23-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal JainView PDF
The Bombay High Court appointed Mr. Shrikant Kulkarni (Retired Judge) as sole arbitrator to resolve a partnership dispute between Alnesh Akil Somji and Vilas Ganpat Manore arising from their partnership agreement of 2012 (reconstituted in 2022). The court directed the parties to share arbitration costs equally and set procedural guidelines for the arbitration proceedings, while expressly keeping all merit issues open for determination by the arbitrator. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Apr-2026
For Hearing (Arbitration Petition U/S. 11)
Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain
-
22-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar SundaresanView PDF
-
18-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. ARP/73/2026
The Bombay High Court appointed Mr. Shrikant Kulkarni (Retired Judge) as sole arbitrator to resolve a partnership dispute between Alnesh Akil Somji and Vilas Ganpat Manore arising from their partnership agreement of 2012 (reconstituted in 2022). The court directed the parties to share arbitration costs equally and set procedural guidelines for the arbitration proceedings, while expressly keeping all merit issues open for determination by the arbitrator. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts