SATYENDRA KEROJI TATUSKAR vs VIKRAM VITARAN FIRM THR. PROPRIETOR MRS. SHUBHADA D.MULAY (DECEASED) THR. LRS. 1. — IA/8851/2024
Case under Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 Section 360. Next hearing: 02nd July 2026.
CNR: HCBM010139232024
Next Hearing
02nd July 2026
Filing Number
IA/7941/2024
Filing Date
13-03-2024
Registration No
IA/8851/2024
Registration Date
09-05-2024
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDEEP V. MARNE
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDEEP V. MARNE
Bench Type
Single
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )
Sub-Category
ORDINARY CIVIL ( 11 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SATYENDRA KEROJI TATUSKAR
Adv. dahibawkarandco
Respondent(s)
VIKRAM VITARAN FIRM THR. PROPRIETOR MRS. SHUBHADA D.MULAY (DECEASED) THR. LRS. 1.
DNYANESHWAR RAMCHANDRA MULAY1.
VIKRAM DNYANESHWAR MULAY
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDEEP V. MARNE
DUE ADMISSION - 1
INTERIM APPLICATION
FOR ORDERS (DUE MATTERS)
FOR ORDERS (DUE MATTERS)
FOR ORDERS (DUE MATTERS)
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 21-01-2025 | DUE ADMISSION - 1 |
| 02-07-2026 | INTERIM APPLICATION |
| 21-01-2026 | FOR ORDERS (DUE MATTERS) |
| 17-11-2025 | FOR ORDERS (DUE MATTERS) |
| 30-09-2025 | FOR ORDERS (DUE MATTERS) |
Orders
The Bombay High Court adjourned the case to 02/07/2026 due to paucity of time and could not hear the balance daily board. Any ad-interim or interim relief previously granted continues until the next hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Bombay High Court adjourned the case to 02/07/2026 due to paucity of time and could not hear the balance daily board. Any ad-interim or interim relief previously granted continues until the next hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts