ED COOPER PREMISES CO OP. SOC. LTD vs DIVISIONAL JOINT REGISTRAR AND ORS — HCBM10138842026

Case under Mah. Co-op. Soc. Act. Status: For Orders (Objection Not Removed). Next hearing: 18th June 2026.

For Orders (Objection Not Removed) Next hearing 18-Jun-2026 this date has passed

CNR: HCBM010138842026

Filing Number

WP/8027/2026

Filing Date

18-Mar-2026

Judge

Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)

Coram

Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)

Bench Type

Single

Category

ELECTION ( 12 )

Sub-Category

CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Mah. Co-op. Soc. Act

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ED COOPER PREMISES CO OP. SOC. LTD

    Adv. Law Competere Consultus

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DIVISIONAL JOINT REGISTRAR AND ORS

  2. 2.DEPUTY REGISTRAR CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY D WARD

  3. 3.MAHESH DILIP DODIA

    Adv. P D JADHAV

  4. 4.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Case History

  1. 18-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 18-Jun-2026

    For Orders (Objection Not Removed)

    Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)

  3. 07-May-2026

    Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)View PDF

    Case Summary: In Writ Petition (Stamp) No. 8027 of 2026, the Bombay High Court's Registrar (Judicial-I) found that petitioner ED COOPER PREMISES CO-OP. SOC. LTD and its advocate failed to remove office objections by the deadline of 21st April 2026. Rather than immediately refusing registration as required under Rule 3(iii) of Chapter XVII, the court granted a second opportunity of two weeks (excluding summer vacation) to cure the defects. If objections remain unresolved, registration will be refused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 21-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 18-Mar-2026

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: In Writ Petition (Stamp) No. 8027 of 2026, the Bombay High Court's Registrar (Judicial-I) found that petitioner ED COOPER PREMISES CO-OP. SOC. LTD and its advocate failed to remove office objections by the deadline of 21st April 2026. Rather than immediately refusing registration as required under Rule 3(iii) of Chapter XVII, the court granted a second opportunity of two weeks (excluding summer vacation) to cure the defects. If objections remain unresolved, registration will be refused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case