M/S ASHJIT REALTIES PVT LTD vs ADDL CONTROLLER OF STAMPS AND ORS — WP/7251/2026

Case under Stamp Act (Maharashtra) Section NA. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.

CNR: HCBM010138702026

Next Hearing

18th June 2026

Filing Number

WP/8020/2026

Filing Date

18-03-2026

Registration No

WP/7251/2026

Registration Date

10-06-2026

Bench Type

Single

Category

LAND REVENUE CODE MATTERS ( 57 )

Sub-Category

Stamp Act matters ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Acts & Sections

Stamp Act (Maharashtra) Section NA

Petitioner(s)

M/S ASHJIT REALTIES PVT LTD

Adv. AVYAAN LEGAL

Respondent(s)

ADDL CONTROLLER OF STAMPS AND ORS

CHIEF CONTROLLING REVENUE AUTHORITY, (IGR) MAHARASHTRA STATE PUNE

COLLECTOR OF STAMPS, MUMBAI

Hearing History

21-04-2026

OBJECTIONS TO BE REMOVED

18-06-2026

FOR ORDERS (OBJECTION NOT REMOVED)

Orders

07-05-2026
Shri. P. P. JADHAV, Registrar(Judl I)

Case Summary: WP/7251/2026 (Note: Court document shows WP 8020/2026) M/S ASHJIT REALTIES PVT LTD v. ADDL CONTROLLER OF STAMPS & ORS On 07/05/2026, the Bombay High Court granted a two-week extension (excluding summer vacation) to the petitioner and its advocate to remove office objections that were previously notified on 21/04/2026. The court adjourned the matter, noting it improper to straightaway refuse registration. If objections remain unremoved after this extension, the Registrar will pass an appropriate order refusing registration under Rule 3(iii), Chapter XVII of Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/7251/2026 (Note: Court document shows WP 8020/2026) M/S ASHJIT REALTIES PVT LTD v. ADDL CONTROLLER OF STAMPS & ORS On 07/05/2026, the Bombay High Court granted a two-week extension (excluding summer vacation) to the petitioner and its advocate to remove office objections that were previously notified on 21/04/2026. The court adjourned the matter, noting it improper to straightaway refuse registration. If objections remain unremoved after this extension, the Registrar will pass an appropriate order refusing registration under Rule 3(iii), Chapter XVII of Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case