M/S ASHJIT REALTIES PVT LTD vs ADDL CONTROLLER OF STAMPS AND ORS — WP/7251/2026

Case under Stamp Act (Maharashtra) Section NA. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.

Next hearing 18-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM010138702026

Filing Number

WP/8020/2026

Filing Date

18-Mar-2026

Registration No

WP/7251/2026

Registration Date

10-Jun-2026

Bench Type

Single

Category

LAND REVENUE CODE MATTERS ( 57 )

Sub-Category

Stamp Act matters ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Stamp Act (Maharashtra) Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S ASHJIT REALTIES PVT LTD

    Adv. AVYAAN LEGAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ADDL CONTROLLER OF STAMPS AND ORS

  2. 2.CHIEF CONTROLLING REVENUE AUTHORITY, (IGR) MAHARASHTRA STATE PUNE

  3. 3.COLLECTOR OF STAMPS, MUMBAI

Case History

  1. 18-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 18-Jun-2026

    For Orders (Objection Not Removed)

    Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)

  3. 07-May-2026

    Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)View PDF

    Case Summary: WP/7251/2026 (Note: Court document shows WP 8020/2026) M/S ASHJIT REALTIES PVT LTD v. ADDL CONTROLLER OF STAMPS & ORS On 07/05/2026, the Bombay High Court granted a two-week extension (excluding summer vacation) to the petitioner and its advocate to remove office objections that were previously notified on 21/04/2026. The court adjourned the matter, noting it improper to straightaway refuse registration. If objections remain unremoved after this extension, the Registrar will pass an appropriate order refusing registration under Rule 3(iii), Chapter XVII of Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 21-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 18-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/7251/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/7251/2026 (Note: Court document shows WP 8020/2026) M/S ASHJIT REALTIES PVT LTD v. ADDL CONTROLLER OF STAMPS & ORS On 07/05/2026, the Bombay High Court granted a two-week extension (excluding summer vacation) to the petitioner and its advocate to remove office objections that were previously notified on 21/04/2026. The court adjourned the matter, noting it improper to straightaway refuse registration. If objections remain unremoved after this extension, the Registrar will pass an appropriate order refusing registration under Rule 3(iii), Chapter XVII of Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case