MARUTI NANA PATIL vs AUTHUM INVESTMENT AND INFRASTRUCTURE LTD LTD AND ANR — HCBM10138542026

Case under Securitisation & Reconstruction of Finiancial Assets Act. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.

CNR: HCBM010138542026

Next Hearing

18th June 2026

Filing Number

WP/8011/2026

Filing Date

18-03-2026

Judge

Shri. P. P. JADHAV, Registrar(Judl I)

Coram

Shri. P. P. JADHAV, Registrar(Judl I)

Bench Type

Division

Category

MERCANTILE LAWS COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS , BANKS ( 28 )

Sub-Category

BRAND ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Acts & Sections

Securitisation & Reconstruction of Finiancial Assets Act

Petitioner(s)

MARUTI NANA PATIL

Adv. Adv v j ghorpade

Respondent(s)

AUTHUM INVESTMENT AND INFRASTRUCTURE LTD LTD AND ANR

AUTHORIZED OFFICER, AUTHUM INVESTMENT AND INFRASTRUCTURE LTD

Hearing History

Judge: Shri. P. P. JADHAV, Registrar(Judl I)

21-04-2026

OBJECTIONS TO BE REMOVED

18-06-2026

FOR ORDERS (OBJECTION NOT REMOVED)

Orders

07-05-2026
Shri. P. P. JADHAV, Registrar(Judl I)

In Writ Petition (Stamp) No. 8011 of 2026, the Bombay High Court granted petitioner Maruti Nana Patil a final opportunity of two weeks (excluding summer vacation) to remove office objections to the petition. The petitioner had previously failed to cure the defects despite being notified on April 21, 2026. If objections remain unresolved, the Registrar will refuse registration of the writ petition as per Rule 3(iii) of Chapter XVII of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

In Writ Petition (Stamp) No. 8011 of 2026, the Bombay High Court granted petitioner Maruti Nana Patil a final opportunity of two weeks (excluding summer vacation) to remove office objections to the petition. The petitioner had previously failed to cure the defects despite being notified on April 21, 2026. If objections remain unresolved, the Registrar will refuse registration of the writ petition as per Rule 3(iii) of Chapter XVII of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case