RAJENDRA PANDITRAO SARAF vs VIKRAM BABASAHEB DAUNDKAR AND ORS. — FA/496/2026

Case under Maharashtra Public Trusts Act Section 47(5). Status: Fresh Matters Auto Listed. Next hearing: : -.

Fresh Matters Auto Listed Next hearing —

CNR: HCBM010138382026

Filing Number

FA/8002/2026

Filing Date

18-Mar-2026

Registration No

FA/496/2026

Registration Date

05-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh

Bench Type

Single

Category

FIRST APPEAL ( 53 )

Sub-Category

Other Appeals - Single Bench ( 6 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Public Trusts Act Section 47(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJENDRA PANDITRAO SARAF

    Adv. Nachiket Shriram Kulkarni

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VIKRAM BABASAHEB DAUNDKAR AND ORS.

  2. 2.JOINT CHARITY COMMISSIONER, PUNE REGION

  3. 3.CHINCHWAD DEVASTHAN TRUST THR.ITS KARBHARI TRUSTEE SHRI. KISHOR VASANT JOSHI

    Adv. Neha Wadekar,( CAVEAT AND V.P. FILED )

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. DeshmukhView PDF

    In First Appeal No. 496 of 2026 before the Bombay High Court, the appeal filed by Rajendra Panditrao Saraf against Vikram Babasaheb Daundkar and others was admitted on June 09, 2026. The court directed that the record and proceedings from the lower court be called for review, with Respondent No. 3 waiving notice of the proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Jun-2026

    Fresh Matters Auto Listed

    Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh

  4. 20-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 18-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. FA/496/2026

casestatus.in Summary

In First Appeal No. 496 of 2026 before the Bombay High Court, the appeal filed by Rajendra Panditrao Saraf against Vikram Babasaheb Daundkar and others was admitted on June 09, 2026. The court directed that the record and proceedings from the lower court be called for review, with Respondent No. 3 waiving notice of the proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case