PRAKASH NIVRUTTI SHINDE AND ORS VIVEKANAND JADHAV vs STATE BANK OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS — WP/7263/2026
Case under Land Acquisition Act Section NA. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM010138032026
Filing Number
WP/7978/2026
Filing Date
18-Mar-2026
Registration No
WP/7263/2026
Registration Date
10-Jun-2026
Bench Type
Division
Category
LAND ACQUISITION/REQUISITION(CENTRAL/STATE) ( 20 )
Sub-Category
REQUISITION ( 11 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 11-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PRAKASH NIVRUTTI SHINDE AND ORS VIVEKANAND JADHAV
-
2.RAMESH SOPAN SHINDE
-
3.SURESH SOPAN SHINDE
-
4.CHANDRAKANT NIVRUTTI SHINDE
-
5.UMESH NIVRUTTI SHINDE
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE BANK OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS
-
2.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR THE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE AND FOREST
-
3.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
-
4.THE COLLECTOR PUNE
-
5.THE MAHARASHTRA STATE ROAD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
-
6.THE MAHARASHTRA STATE ROAD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
-
7.THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER AND SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER MAVAL MULSHI
Case History
-
18-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
18-Jun-2026
For Orders (Objection Not Removed)
Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)
-
07-May-2026
Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)View PDF
The writ petition was adjourned. The petitioners and their advocate failed to remove office objections by the notified date of April 21, 2026. The Registrar granted a final two-week extension (excluding summer vacation) to cure the defects, warning that failure to comply will result in refusal of registration under applicable rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
21-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/7263/2026
The writ petition was adjourned. The petitioners and their advocate failed to remove office objections by the notified date of April 21, 2026. The Registrar granted a final two-week extension (excluding summer vacation) to cure the defects, warning that failure to comply will result in refusal of registration under applicable rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts