JIYAUDDIN JAINUDDIN SHAIKH AND ORS vs THE CHARITY COMMISSIONER FOR STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS — HCBM10137992026
Case under Bombay Public Trust Act. Status: For Orders (Objection Not Removed). Next hearing: 18th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM010137992026
Filing Number
WP/7974/2026
Filing Date
18-Mar-2026
Judge
Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)
Coram
Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)
Bench Type
Single
Category
RELIGIOUS/CHARITABLE ENDOWMWNTS AND PUBLIC TRUST ( 33 )
Sub-Category
MANAGEMENT/ADMINISTRATION DISPUTES OF TEMPLES(PRIEST, MAHANT,PUJARI) ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 11-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.JIYAUDDIN JAINUDDIN SHAIKH AND ORS
Adv. Abhishek
-
2.KANKRU RAJMOHAMMAD PATEL
-
3.RAJJAK MUNIR SAYYED
-
4.DASTAGIR BABULAL SHAIKH
-
5.KALIM HASAN SHAIKH
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE CHARITY COMMISSIONER FOR STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS
-
2.JOINT CHARITY COMMISSIONER, NASHIK REGION, NASHIK
-
3.THE DEPUTY CHARITY COMMISSIONER NASHIK
-
4.THE ASSISTANT CHARITY COMMISSIONER, NASHIK
-
5.NIZAMODDIN MOHIYODDIN KHAN THR TRUSTEE
Case History
-
18-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
18-Jun-2026
For Orders (Objection Not Removed)
Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)
-
07-May-2026
Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)View PDF
Case Summary: Writ Petition (Stamp) No. 7974 of 2026 was adjourned. The petitioners and their advocate failed to remove office objections despite notification on April 21, 2026. The Registrar granted a final two-week extension (excluding summer vacation) to cure the defects, warning that failure to do so will result in refusal of registration under Rule 3(iii) of Chapter XVII of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
21-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Mar-2026
Case filed
Case Summary: Writ Petition (Stamp) No. 7974 of 2026 was adjourned. The petitioners and their advocate failed to remove office objections despite notification on April 21, 2026. The Registrar granted a final two-week extension (excluding summer vacation) to cure the defects, warning that failure to do so will result in refusal of registration under Rule 3(iii) of Chapter XVII of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts