JIYAUDDIN JAINUDDIN SHAIKH AND ORS vs THE CHARITY COMMISSIONER FOR STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS — HCBM10137992026
Case under Bombay Public Trust Act. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM010137992026
Next Hearing
18th June 2026
Filing Number
WP/7974/2026
Filing Date
18-03-2026
Judge
Shri. P. P. JADHAV, Registrar(Judl I)
Coram
Shri. P. P. JADHAV, Registrar(Judl I)
Bench Type
Single
Category
RELIGIOUS/CHARITABLE ENDOWMWNTS AND PUBLIC TRUST ( 33 )
Sub-Category
MANAGEMENT/ADMINISTRATION DISPUTES OF TEMPLES(PRIEST, MAHANT,PUJARI) ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
JIYAUDDIN JAINUDDIN SHAIKH AND ORS
Adv. Abhishek
KANKRU RAJMOHAMMAD PATEL
RAJJAK MUNIR SAYYED
DASTAGIR BABULAL SHAIKH
KALIM HASAN SHAIKH
Respondent(s)
THE CHARITY COMMISSIONER FOR STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS
JOINT CHARITY COMMISSIONER, NASHIK REGION, NASHIK
THE DEPUTY CHARITY COMMISSIONER NASHIK
THE ASSISTANT CHARITY COMMISSIONER, NASHIK
NIZAMODDIN MOHIYODDIN KHAN THR TRUSTEE
Hearing History
Judge: Shri. P. P. JADHAV, Registrar(Judl I)
OBJECTIONS TO BE REMOVED
FOR ORDERS (OBJECTION NOT REMOVED)
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 21-04-2026 | OBJECTIONS TO BE REMOVED |
| 18-06-2026 | FOR ORDERS (OBJECTION NOT REMOVED) |
Orders
Case Summary: Writ Petition (Stamp) No. 7974 of 2026 was adjourned. The petitioners and their advocate failed to remove office objections despite notification on April 21, 2026. The Registrar granted a final two-week extension (excluding summer vacation) to cure the defects, warning that failure to do so will result in refusal of registration under Rule 3(iii) of Chapter XVII of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Writ Petition (Stamp) No. 7974 of 2026 was adjourned. The petitioners and their advocate failed to remove office objections despite notification on April 21, 2026. The Registrar granted a final two-week extension (excluding summer vacation) to cure the defects, warning that failure to do so will result in refusal of registration under Rule 3(iii) of Chapter XVII of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts