ANANDA SHANKAR ALHAT AND ORS VIVEKANAND JADHAV vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY MANTRALAYA — WP/7266/2026

Case under Land Acquisition Act Section NA. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.

Next hearing 17-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM010137972026

Filing Number

WP/7972/2026

Filing Date

18-Mar-2026

Registration No

WP/7266/2026

Registration Date

10-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat

Bench Type

Division

Category

LAND ACQUISITION/REQUISITION(CENTRAL/STATE) ( 20 )

Sub-Category

REQUISITION ( 11 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition Act Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ANANDA SHANKAR ALHAT AND ORS VIVEKANAND JADHAV

  2. 2.NANDA RAMBHAU MALI ALIAS NANDAKUMAR RAMBHAU ALHAT

  3. 3.KRUSHNA RAMBHAU MALI

  4. 4.BALU RAMBHAU MALI ALIAS BALU RAMBHAU ALHAT

  5. 5.SUNIL RAMBHAU MALI ALIAS SUNIL RAMBHAU ALHAT

  6. 6.KUNDA RAMBHAU MALI ALIAS KUNDA RAMBHAU ALHAT

  7. 7.DASHRATH NARAYAN MALI

  8. 8.DATTATRAY NATHU ALHAT

  9. 9.MATHURA MARUTI PARANDWAL

  10. 10.INDIRA BABASAHEB RASKAR

  11. 11.NANDA BALASAHEB BHUJBAL

  12. 12.SHANTARAM RAMBHAU MALI ALIAS SHANTARAM RAMBHAU ALHAT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY MANTRALAYA

  2. 2.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR THE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE AND FOREST

  3. 3.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT

  4. 4.THE COLLECTOR PUNE

  5. 5.THE MAHARASHTRA STATE ROAD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

  6. 6.THE MAHARASHTRA STATE ROAD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

  7. 7.THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER AND SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER MAVAL MULSHI

Case History

  1. 17-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-May-2026

    Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)View PDF

    Case Summary: WP/7972 of 2026 The writ petition was notified on 21st April 2026 for removal of office objections, but the petitioners and their advocate failed to comply. Rather than immediately refusing registration as mandated by Rule 3 sub-rule (iii) of Chapter XVII of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960, the Registrar granted a final opportunity of two weeks (excluding Summer Vacation) to cure the defects. If office objections remain unremoved, appropriate orders rejecting the petition will follow. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 21-Apr-2026

    Objections To Be Removed

    Assistant Registrar

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/7266/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/7972 of 2026 The writ petition was notified on 21st April 2026 for removal of office objections, but the petitioners and their advocate failed to comply. Rather than immediately refusing registration as mandated by Rule 3 sub-rule (iii) of Chapter XVII of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960, the Registrar granted a final opportunity of two weeks (excluding Summer Vacation) to cure the defects. If office objections remain unremoved, appropriate orders rejecting the petition will follow. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case