KAMAL W/O BASLING ALLAM AND ANR vs LAL BHERUMAL LAUNGANI AND ANR — HCBM10137882026

Case under Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.

CNR: HCBM010137882026

Next Hearing

08th June 2026

Filing Number

WP/7969/2026

Filing Date

18-03-2026

Judge

Shri. P. P. JADHAV, Registrar(Judl I)

Coram

Shri. P. P. JADHAV, Registrar(Judl I)

Bench Type

Single

Category

RENT ACT ( 34 )

Sub-Category

ENHANCEMENT OF RENT ( 5 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999

Petitioner(s)

KAMAL W/O BASLING ALLAM AND ANR

Adv. DHAKORKAR SIDDHESH

PARMESHWAR S/O BASLING ALLAM

Respondent(s)

LAL BHERUMAL LAUNGANI AND ANR

RAJSHEKHAR S/O BASLING ALLAM

Hearing History

Judge: Shri. P. P. JADHAV, Registrar(Judl I)

23-04-2026

OBJECTIONS TO BE REMOVED

Orders

08-06-2026
Shri. P. P. JADHAV, Registrar(Judl I)

Case Summary: In Writ Petition (Stamp) No. 7969 of 2026 before the Bombay High Court, the Registrar (Judicial-I) found that petitioners Kamal and Parmeshwar failed to remove office objections despite notification on 23rd/24th April 2026. Rather than immediately refusing registration under Rule 3(iii) of Chapter XVII of the Bombay High Court Rules 1960, the court granted petitioners and their advocate an additional two weeks to cure the defects. If objections remain unremoved, registration will be refused and appropriate action taken under Rule 3(iii). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: In Writ Petition (Stamp) No. 7969 of 2026 before the Bombay High Court, the Registrar (Judicial-I) found that petitioners Kamal and Parmeshwar failed to remove office objections despite notification on 23rd/24th April 2026. Rather than immediately refusing registration under Rule 3(iii) of Chapter XVII of the Bombay High Court Rules 1960, the court granted petitioners and their advocate an additional two weeks to cure the defects. If objections remain unremoved, registration will be refused and appropriate action taken under Rule 3(iii). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case