DADASO SHANKAR JAGTAP AND ORS vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR THE SECRETARY DEPT AND ORS — WP/3692/2026

Case under The Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act,1961 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 17th April 2026.

CNR: HCBM010137772026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

WP/7960/2026

Filing Date

18-03-2026

Registration No

WP/3692/2026

Registration Date

18-03-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAVINDRA V. GHUGE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE HITEN SHAMRAO VENEGAVKAR

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAVINDRA V. GHUGE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE HITEN SHAMRAO VENEGAVKAR

Bench Type

Division

Category

OTHER SERVICE MATTERS ( 66 )

Sub-Category

TEACHING STAFF ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

17th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Acts & Sections

The Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act,1961 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

DADASO SHANKAR JAGTAP AND ORS

Adv. Padmaja Malgaonkar

BALASAHEB BIRAJI KOLAPE

NAGNATH JAGANNATH JADHAV

HANUMANT GULABRAO MALSHIKARE

MAHAVIR UDDHAV DEVADE

ATUL RAJARAM JAUNJAL

JAYANT SHANKAR BHOSALE

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR THE SECRETARY DEPT AND ORS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRO THE SECRETARY RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT

THE DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION (PRIMARY), CENTRAL BUILDING, PUNE-

THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, PUNE REGION

THE DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER, PUNE REGION, PUNE

THE ZILLA PARISHAD PUNE THRO ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Adv. Pandurang Hirachand Gaikwad

THE EDUCATION OFFICER (PRIMARY),PUNE ZILLA PARISHAD

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAVINDRA V. GHUGE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE HITEN SHAMRAO VENEGAVKAR

23-03-2026

FRESH ADMISSION

17-04-2026

URGENT ADMISSION

15-04-2026

FRESH ADMISSION

30-03-2026

FRESH ADMISSION

21-04-2026

FRESH ADMISSION

Orders

17-04-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAVINDRA V. GHUGE,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE HITEN SHAMRAO VENEGAVKAR

Summary The Bombay High Court partly allowed the writ petition by consent of parties. One petitioner (Nagnath Jadhav, age 48) was rejected as he did not meet the 53-year age threshold for protection from deployment in difficult areas. The remaining six petitioners, all above 53 years of age, were granted relief under Government Resolution dated 18.06.2024 and must file fresh applications by April 30, 2026 (or May 1-5, 2026 if online) for deployment in simple areas, which the respondents agreed to positively consider. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Bombay High Court partly allowed the writ petition by consent of parties. One petitioner (Nagnath Jadhav, age 48) was rejected as he did not meet the 53-year age threshold for protection from deployment in difficult areas. The remaining six petitioners, all above 53 years of age, were granted relief under Government Resolution dated 18.06.2024 and must file fresh applications by April 30, 2026 (or May 1-5, 2026 if online) for deployment in simple areas, which the respondents agreed to positively consider. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case