DADASO SHANKAR JAGTAP AND ORS vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR THE SECRETARY DEPT AND ORS — WP/3692/2026

Case under The Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act,1961 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 17th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM010137772026

Filing Number

WP/7960/2026

Filing Date

18-Mar-2026

Registration No

WP/3692/2026

Registration Date

18-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge , Hon'ble Shri Justice Hiten Shamrao Venegavkar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge , Hon'ble Shri Justice Hiten Shamrao Venegavkar

Bench Type

Division

Category

OTHER SERVICE MATTERS ( 66 )

Sub-Category

TEACHING STAFF ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

17-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 24-May-2026

Acts & Sections

The Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act,1961 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DADASO SHANKAR JAGTAP AND ORS

    Adv. Padmaja Malgaonkar

  2. 2.BALASAHEB BIRAJI KOLAPE

  3. 3.NAGNATH JAGANNATH JADHAV

  4. 4.HANUMANT GULABRAO MALSHIKARE

  5. 5.MAHAVIR UDDHAV DEVADE

  6. 6.ATUL RAJARAM JAUNJAL

  7. 7.JAYANT SHANKAR BHOSALE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR THE SECRETARY DEPT AND ORS

  2. 2.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRO THE SECRETARY RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT

  3. 3.THE DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION (PRIMARY), CENTRAL BUILDING, PUNE-

  4. 4.THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, PUNE REGION

  5. 5.THE DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER, PUNE REGION, PUNE

  6. 6.THE ZILLA PARISHAD PUNE THRO ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

    Adv. Pandurang Hirachand Gaikwad

  7. 7.THE EDUCATION OFFICER (PRIMARY),PUNE ZILLA PARISHAD

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 21-Apr-2026

    Fresh Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay J. Mantri

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge,hon'ble Shri Justice Hiten Shamrao VenegavkarView PDF

    Summary The Bombay High Court partly allowed the writ petition by consent of parties. One petitioner (Nagnath Jadhav, age 48) was rejected as he did not meet the 53-year age threshold for protection from deployment in difficult areas. The remaining six petitioners, all above 53 years of age, were granted relief under Government Resolution dated 18.06.2024 and must file fresh applications by April 30, 2026 (or May 1-5, 2026 if online) for deployment in simple areas, which the respondents agreed to positively consider. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 17-Apr-2026

    Urgent Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge , Hon'ble Shri Justice Hiten Shamrao Venegavkar

  5. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge,hon'ble Shri Justice Hiten Shamrao VenegavkarView PDF

  6. 15-Apr-2026

    Fresh Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay J. Mantri

  7. 30-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge,hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay J. MantriView PDF

  8. 30-Mar-2026

    Fresh Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay J. Mantri

  9. 27-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge,hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay J. MantriView PDF

  10. 23-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge,hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay J. MantriView PDF

  11. 23-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 18-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/3692/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Bombay High Court partly allowed the writ petition by consent of parties. One petitioner (Nagnath Jadhav, age 48) was rejected as he did not meet the 53-year age threshold for protection from deployment in difficult areas. The remaining six petitioners, all above 53 years of age, were granted relief under Government Resolution dated 18.06.2024 and must file fresh applications by April 30, 2026 (or May 1-5, 2026 if online) for deployment in simple areas, which the respondents agreed to positively consider. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case