SUNIL CHANDRAKANT BOTRE AND ORS VIVEKANAND JADHAV vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY MANTRALAYA AND ORS — WP/7261/2026
Case under Land Acquisition Act Section NA. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM010137662026
Filing Number
WP/7952/2026
Filing Date
18-Mar-2026
Registration No
WP/7261/2026
Registration Date
10-Jun-2026
Bench Type
Division
Category
LAND ACQUISITION/REQUISITION(CENTRAL/STATE) ( 20 )
Sub-Category
REQUISITION ( 11 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 11-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SUNIL CHANDRAKANT BOTRE AND ORS VIVEKANAND JADHAV
-
2.AKASH CHANDRAKANT BOTRE
-
3.TARABAI CHANDRAKANT BOTRE
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY MANTRALAYA AND ORS
-
2.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRO THE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE AND FOREST
-
3.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRO THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
-
4.THE COLLECTOR PUNE, COLLECTOR OFFICE PUNE
-
5.THE MAHARASHTRA STATE ROAD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, MUMBAI
-
6.THE MAHARASHTRA STATE ROAD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, CAMP OFFICE
-
7.THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, AND SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICER KHED (RAJGURUNAGAR)
Case History
-
18-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
18-Jun-2026
For Orders (Objection Not Removed)
Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)
-
07-May-2026
Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)View PDF
Case Summary: WP(Stamp) 7952/2026 The Bombay High Court (Registrar Judicial-I) adjourned the petition after the petitioners and their advocate failed to remove office objections by the April 21, 2026 deadline. The court granted an additional two weeks (excluding summer vacation) to cure the defects; failure to comply will result in refusal of registration under Rule 3(iii) of Chapter XVII of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
21-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/7261/2026
Case Summary: WP(Stamp) 7952/2026 The Bombay High Court (Registrar Judicial-I) adjourned the petition after the petitioners and their advocate failed to remove office objections by the April 21, 2026 deadline. The court granted an additional two weeks (excluding summer vacation) to cure the defects; failure to comply will result in refusal of registration under Rule 3(iii) of Chapter XVII of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts