BANK OF MAHARASHTRA THROU. SANJEEV VARMA vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROU. GOVT PLEADER AND ORS — WP/4802/2026
Case under Securitisation & Reconstruction of Finiancial Assets Act Section NA. Status: For Compliance. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM010137452026
Filing Number
WP/7936/2026
Filing Date
18-Mar-2026
Registration No
WP/4802/2026
Registration Date
10-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat
Bench Type
Division
Category
MERCANTILE LAWS COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS , BANKS ( 28 )
Sub-Category
MATTERS RELATING TO SECURITISATION AND RECONSTRUCTION OF FINANCIAL ASSETS ( 10 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 27-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BANK OF MAHARASHTRA THROU. SANJEEV VARMA
Adv. Medha Rane
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROU. GOVT PLEADER AND ORS
-
2.THE SUPERINTENDENT OF CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF PUNE
Adv. NARGOLKAR
-
3.SURYAKANT NAMDEVRAO JADHAV COURT COMMISSIONER
-
4.THE SENIOR INSPECTOR OF POLICE
-
5.RUPESH ARVIND CHOUDHARI
Case History
-
10-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
10-Jun-2026
For Compliance
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale,hon'ble Shri Justice Farhan Parvez DubashView PDF
-
06-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale,hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak ShirsatView PDF
-
06-May-2026
For Compliance
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat
-
17-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale,hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak ShirsatView PDF
-
17-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale,hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak ShirsatView PDF
Case Summary: WP 4802/2026 The Bombay High Court directed the Court Commissioner to take physical possession of a secured asset on 5th May 2026 with police assistance, after borrowers allegedly trespassed into the property despite Bank of Maharashtra's earlier lawful possession under the Securitisation Act, 2002. The court granted leave to amend the cause title and warned the Senior Inspector of Police that non-compliance would require personal court appearance, with the case listed for compliance review on 6th May 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/4802/2026
Case Summary: WP 4802/2026 The Bombay High Court directed the Court Commissioner to take physical possession of a secured asset on 5th May 2026 with police assistance, after borrowers allegedly trespassed into the property despite Bank of Maharashtra's earlier lawful possession under the Securitisation Act, 2002. The court granted leave to amend the cause title and warned the Senior Inspector of Police that non-compliance would require personal court appearance, with the case listed for compliance review on 6th May 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts