BANK OF MAHARASHTRA vs STATE OF MAHARAHTRA THR GOVT PLEADER AND ORS — WP/4795/2026

Case under Securitisation & Reconstruction of Finiancial Assets Act Section na. Status: For Compliance. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.

For Compliance Next hearing 09-Jun-2026 this date has passed

CNR: HCBM010137222026

Filing Number

WP/7923/2026

Filing Date

18-Mar-2026

Registration No

WP/4795/2026

Registration Date

10-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat

Bench Type

Division

Category

MERCANTILE LAWS COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS , BANKS ( 28 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS RELATING TO SECURITISATION AND RECONSTRUCTION OF FINANCIAL ASSETS ( 10 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 27-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Securitisation & Reconstruction of Finiancial Assets Act Section na

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BANK OF MAHARASHTRA

    Adv. Medha Rane

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAHARAHTRA THR GOVT PLEADER AND ORS

  2. 2.THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE/COLLECTOR OF PUNE

  3. 3.THE RESIDENT NAIB TAHSILDAR OF PUNE CITY

  4. 4.THE SENIOR INSPCETOR OF POLICE KHADAK POLICE STATION PUNE CITY

  5. 5.MANOHAR DINKAR KHIRID

  6. 6.SUNIL DINKAR KHIRID

  7. 7.VAISHALI SUNIL KHIRID

Case History

  1. 09-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Jun-2026

    For Compliance

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat

  3. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale,hon'ble Shri Justice Farhan Parvez DubashView PDF

    Case Summary: WP/4795/2026 The High Court of Bombay allowed Bank of Maharashtra's petition to file an additional affidavit within one week. Although the court had previously ordered the Resident Naib Tahsildar of Pune City to deliver secured asset possession to the bank on 04.05.2026, borrowers subsequently trespassed into the property; the bank filed a police complaint. The court granted liberty to move the Vacation Court and disposed of the praecipe. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale,hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak ShirsatView PDF

  5. 06-May-2026

    For Compliance

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat

  6. 17-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale,hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak ShirsatView PDF

  7. 17-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale,hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak ShirsatView PDF

  8. 17-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 18-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/4795/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/4795/2026 The High Court of Bombay allowed Bank of Maharashtra's petition to file an additional affidavit within one week. Although the court had previously ordered the Resident Naib Tahsildar of Pune City to deliver secured asset possession to the bank on 04.05.2026, borrowers subsequently trespassed into the property; the bank filed a police complaint. The court granted liberty to move the Vacation Court and disposed of the praecipe. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case