BANK OF MAHARASHTRA vs STATE OF MAHARAHTRA THR GOVT PLEADER AND ORS — WP/4795/2026
Case under Securitisation & Reconstruction of Finiancial Assets Act Section na. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM010137222026
Next Hearing
09th June 2026
Filing Number
WP/7923/2026
Filing Date
18-03-2026
Registration No
WP/4795/2026
Registration Date
10-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANISH PITALE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHREERAM VINAYAK SHIRSAT
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANISH PITALE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHREERAM VINAYAK SHIRSAT
Bench Type
Division
Category
MERCANTILE LAWS COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS , BANKS ( 28 )
Sub-Category
MATTERS RELATING TO SECURITISATION AND RECONSTRUCTION OF FINANCIAL ASSETS ( 10 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
BANK OF MAHARASHTRA
Adv. Medha Rane
Respondent(s)
STATE OF MAHARAHTRA THR GOVT PLEADER AND ORS
THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE/COLLECTOR OF PUNE
THE RESIDENT NAIB TAHSILDAR OF PUNE CITY
THE SENIOR INSPCETOR OF POLICE KHADAK POLICE STATION PUNE CITY
MANOHAR DINKAR KHIRID
SUNIL DINKAR KHIRID
VAISHALI SUNIL KHIRID
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANISH PITALE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHREERAM VINAYAK SHIRSAT
FRESH ADMISSION
FOR COMPLIANCE
FOR COMPLIANCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-04-2026 | FRESH ADMISSION |
| 09-06-2026 | FOR COMPLIANCE |
| 06-05-2026 | FOR COMPLIANCE |
Orders
Case Summary: WP/4795/2026 The High Court of Bombay allowed Bank of Maharashtra's petition to file an additional affidavit within one week. Although the court had previously ordered the Resident Naib Tahsildar of Pune City to deliver secured asset possession to the bank on 04.05.2026, borrowers subsequently trespassed into the property; the bank filed a police complaint. The court granted liberty to move the Vacation Court and disposed of the praecipe. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: WP/4795/2026 The High Court of Bombay allowed Bank of Maharashtra's petition to file an additional affidavit within one week. Although the court had previously ordered the Resident Naib Tahsildar of Pune City to deliver secured asset possession to the bank on 04.05.2026, borrowers subsequently trespassed into the property; the bank filed a police complaint. The court granted liberty to move the Vacation Court and disposed of the praecipe. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts