NIRMALA VASUDEV BHAT AND ORS vs GOKULITES CO-OP HOUSING SOCIETY LTD AND ORS — HCBM10136992026

Case under Mah. Ownership Flats Act. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.

CNR: HCBM010136992026

Next Hearing

19th June 2026

Filing Number

WP/7909/2026

Filing Date

18-03-2026

Judge

Shri. P. P. JADHAV, Registrar(Judl I)

Coram

Shri. P. P. JADHAV, Registrar(Judl I)

Bench Type

Single

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )

Sub-Category

Orders passed by Quasi Judicial Authority Other than Labour and Industrial Court ( 105 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Acts & Sections

Mah. Ownership Flats Act

Petitioner(s)

NIRMALA VASUDEV BHAT AND ORS

Adv. DATTA MANE

PRAVINA PRAMOD SHANBHAG

ARUNA VENKATESH BHAT

SULABHA VARDRAI NAYAK

VASUDHA RAMKRISHNA SHENOY

GAJANAN MOHAN NAYAK (DECEASED) THR LHRS(Legal Heir)6.

SUMAN GAJANAN NAYAK6.

GURUDUTT GAJANAN NAYAK6.

GAYATRI GAJANAN NAYAK

Respondent(s)

GOKULITES CO-OP HOUSING SOCIETY LTD AND ORS

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISTRICT DEPUTY REGISTRAR (DDR)

HEMLATA KAMAL BHATIA

NIHS RE LIFE HOSPITAL LTD., THR ITS DIRECTOR S.V. BABU

TEHSILDAR BORIVALI

SUB REGISTRAR, BORIVALI TALUKA

COLLECTOR OF MUMBAI SUBURBAN DISTRICT

ADDL. COLLECTOR AND COMPETENT AUTHORITY (ULC)

Hearing History

Judge: Shri. P. P. JADHAV, Registrar(Judl I)

22-04-2026

OBJECTIONS TO BE REMOVED

19-06-2026

FOR ORDERS (OBJECTION NOT REMOVED)

Orders

08-05-2026
Shri. P. P. JADHAV, Registrar(Judl I)

Case Summary: Writ Petition (Stamp) No. 7909 of 2026 was adjourned. The petitioners and their advocate failed to remove office objections after being notified on 22 April 2026. The Registrar (Judicial-I) granted two weeks' additional time (excluding summer vacation) to cure the defects, warning that failure to do so will result in refusal of registration under Rule 3(iii), Chapter XVII of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Writ Petition (Stamp) No. 7909 of 2026 was adjourned. The petitioners and their advocate failed to remove office objections after being notified on 22 April 2026. The Registrar (Judicial-I) granted two weeks' additional time (excluding summer vacation) to cure the defects, warning that failure to do so will result in refusal of registration under Rule 3(iii), Chapter XVII of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case