ANIL VAMAN VESAVKAR SINCE DECEASED THROUGH LEGAL HEIRS(Legal Heir) vs SHAKUNTALA LAKSHMAN GHARAT — HCBM10136832025
Case under C.p.c.- (interlocutory Order) Section 100. Next hearing: 23rd April 2026.
CNR: HCBM010136832025
Next Hearing
23rd April 2026
e-Filing Number
05-03-2025
Filing Number
SA/8412/2025
Filing Date
06-03-2025
Judge
Dr.M.S. Deshpande, Registrar (Judicial - II)
Coram
Dr.M.S. Deshpande, Registrar (Judicial - II)
Bench Type
Single
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )
Sub-Category
ORDINARY CIVIL ( 11 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ANIL VAMAN VESAVKAR SINCE DECEASED THROUGH LEGAL HEIRS(Legal Heir)
Adv. Rohit D Joshi 1.
AASHA ANIL VESAVAKAR NOW DECEASED
Adv. ROHIT JOSHI1.
AMIT ANIL VESAVKAR
Adv. ROHIT JOSHI1.
JAYASHRI AASHISH MHATRE
Adv. ROHIT JOSHI
AMIT ANIL VESAVKAR
Adv. ROHIT JOSHI
Respondent(s)
SHAKUNTALA LAKSHMAN GHARAT
GULAB DIPAK KAPADIA
MAHUMALTI LAKSHMAN GHARAT
KIRAN LAKSHMAN GHARAT
GEETA LAKSHMAN GHARAT
YOGITA LAKSHMAN GHARAT
PRABHADEVI LAKSHMAN GHARAT
Hearing History
Judge: Dr.M.S. Deshpande, Registrar (Judicial - II)
FOR ORDERS (OBJECTION NOT REMOVED)
FOR ORDERS (OBJECTION NOT REMOVED)
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-06-2025 | FOR ORDERS (OBJECTION NOT REMOVED) |
| 23-04-2026 | FOR ORDERS (OBJECTION NOT REMOVED) |
Orders
Case Summary The Bombay High Court's Registrar directed the appellant's advocate to remove office objections to the Second Appeal within two weeks by 23rd April 2026. The appeal had already been granted two weeks' extension but objections remained unresolved. The Registrar warned that failure to cure the defects would result in automatic refusal of registration without further court reference and no additional extensions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The Bombay High Court's Registrar directed the appellant's advocate to remove office objections to the Second Appeal within two weeks by 23rd April 2026. The appeal had already been granted two weeks' extension but objections remained unresolved. The Registrar warned that failure to cure the defects would result in automatic refusal of registration without further court reference and no additional extensions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts