AMAN FAHEEM KHAN vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — BA/1299/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Allowed To be withdrawn on 23rd April 2026.
CNR: HCBM010136002026
Filing Number
BA/5761/2026
Filing Date
17-Mar-2026
Registration No
BA/1299/2026
Registration Date
18-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. Joshi
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. Joshi
Bench Type
Single
Category
BAIL ( 51 )
Sub-Category
Regular ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Decision Date
23-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed To be withdrawn
Last updated 28-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.AMAN FAHEEM KHAN
Adv. Prabhanjay R Dave
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
23-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. JoshiView PDF
Case Summary: BA/1299/2026 The Bombay High Court allowed 18-year-old Aman Faheem Khan to withdraw his bail application with liberty to file a fresh application before the Sessions Court, after his previous bail was rejected solely on grounds of a pending supplementary chargesheet. The court directed the Sessions Court to expeditiously decide any fresh bail application on merits without being influenced by earlier observations, emphasizing the applicant's young age. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Apr-2026
Fresh Admission (Bail Applications)
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. Joshi
-
27-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. JoshiView PDF
-
27-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. BA/1299/2026
Case Summary: BA/1299/2026 The Bombay High Court allowed 18-year-old Aman Faheem Khan to withdraw his bail application with liberty to file a fresh application before the Sessions Court, after his previous bail was rejected solely on grounds of a pending supplementary chargesheet. The court directed the Sessions Court to expeditiously decide any fresh bail application on merits without being influenced by earlier observations, emphasizing the applicant's young age. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts