MR. RAJENDRA ARMUGAM PILLAY vs MR. RATANRAJ ARMUGAM PILLAY — IA/3019/2026

Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 Section 11. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 04th May 2026.

CNR: HCBM010135992026

CASE DISPOSED

e-Filing Number

17-03-2026

Filing Number

IA/7839/2026

Filing Date

17-03-2026

Registration No

IA/3019/2026

Registration Date

17-04-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN

Bench Type

Single

Category

ARBITRATION ( 4 )

Sub-Category

APPOINTMENT OF ARBITRATORS ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

04th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Acts & Sections

Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 Section 11

Petitioner(s)

MR. RAJENDRA ARMUGAM PILLAY

Adv. Shon Gadgil

MRS. SELVI RAJENDRA PILLAY

Adv. GADGIL SHON DEEPAK

Respondent(s)

MR. RATANRAJ ARMUGAM PILLAY

MRS. UMA RATANRAJ PILLAY

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN

18-04-2026

INTERIM APPLICATION

04-05-2026

INTERIM APPLICATION

Orders

04-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN

Case Summary: IA/3019/2026 The Bombay High Court modified its December 22, 2025 order regarding the arbitration dispute between Rajendra Armugam Pillay and Ratanraj Armugam Pillay. With both parties' consent, the court clarified that the arbitrator it had previously appointed would act as a sole arbitrator (rather than one member of a three-member tribunal) to adjudicate the disputes between the parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: IA/3019/2026 The Bombay High Court modified its December 22, 2025 order regarding the arbitration dispute between Rajendra Armugam Pillay and Ratanraj Armugam Pillay. With both parties' consent, the court clarified that the arbitrator it had previously appointed would act as a sole arbitrator (rather than one member of a three-member tribunal) to adjudicate the disputes between the parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case