ASHISH THOLIA vs RIDDHI THOLIA AND ANR — WP/1958/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 04th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM010135732026
Filing Number
WP/5742/2026
Filing Date
17-Mar-2026
Registration No
WP/1958/2026
Registration Date
15-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe
Bench Type
Single
Category
CRIMINAL ( 9 )
Sub-Category
Quashing FIR, C.R., Charge Sheet - Crime against Women and Children ( 106 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Decision Date
04-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 11-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ASHISH THOLIA
Adv. Sushmitha Sherigar
Respondent(s)
-
1.RIDDHI THOLIA AND ANR
-
2.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. BhobeView PDF
Case Summary: WP/1958/2026 - Ashish Tholia v. Riddhi Tholia The Bombay High Court quashed FIR No. 283/2023 (charging offences including cheating, forgery, cruelty, dowry violations) after the parties resolved their matrimonial dispute through consent terms filed in a separate family matter (ABA No. 1953/2025). The court found no useful purpose in continuing criminal prosecution, relying on Supreme Court precedent that FIRs in settled matrimonial disputes can be quashed. However, the court imposed costs (Rs. 50,000 each from petitioners and respondent-wife to welfare funds) as a condition precedent, noting the dispute should not have been escalated to police. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
27-Apr-2026
At 3.00 P.M.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe
-
21-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. BhobeView PDF
-
21-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/1958/2026
Case Summary: WP/1958/2026 - Ashish Tholia v. Riddhi Tholia The Bombay High Court quashed FIR No. 283/2023 (charging offences including cheating, forgery, cruelty, dowry violations) after the parties resolved their matrimonial dispute through consent terms filed in a separate family matter (ABA No. 1953/2025). The court found no useful purpose in continuing criminal prosecution, relying on Supreme Court precedent that FIRs in settled matrimonial disputes can be quashed. However, the court imposed costs (Rs. 50,000 each from petitioners and respondent-wife to welfare funds) as a condition precedent, noting the dispute should not have been escalated to police. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts