ATMARAM RAMCHANDRA KURIL AND ORS vs RAMSAKAL JAISWAR AND ORS — HCBM10135312026

Case under C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order). Next hearing: 16th June 2026.

Next hearing 16-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM010135312026

Filing Number

WP/7812/2026

Filing Date

17-Mar-2026

Judge

Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)

Coram

Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)

Bench Type

Single

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )

Sub-Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 11 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ATMARAM RAMCHANDRA KURIL AND ORS

    Adv. LexFort Associates

  2. 2.SHREEPAL RAMCHANDRA KURIL

  3. 3.RAJKUMAR RAMCHANDRA KURIL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAMSAKAL JAISWAR AND ORS

  2. 2.RAMESH DAYARAM KURIL

  3. 3.BHEEMSEN RAMCHARAN KURIL (SINCE DECEASED THR. LEGAL HEIR)(Legal Heir)3.

  4. 4.NIRMALA BHEESEN KURIL3.

  5. 5.ABHAY BHEEMSEN KURIL3.

  6. 6.ADITYA BHEEMSEN KURIL3.

  7. 7.ANANYA BHEEMSEV KURIL

Case History

  1. 16-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 16-Jun-2026

    For Orders (Objection Not Removed)

    Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)

  3. 05-May-2026

    Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)View PDF

    Case Summary In Writ Petition (Stamp) No. 7812 of 2026 before the Bombay High Court, the petitioners failed to remove office objections by the April 17, 2026 deadline. The Registrar granted a final two-week extension (excluding summer vacation) to cure the defects; failure to do so will result in refusal of registration under Rule 3(iii), Chapter XVII of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 17-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 17-Mar-2026

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary In Writ Petition (Stamp) No. 7812 of 2026 before the Bombay High Court, the petitioners failed to remove office objections by the April 17, 2026 deadline. The Registrar granted a final two-week extension (excluding summer vacation) to cure the defects; failure to do so will result in refusal of registration under Rule 3(iii), Chapter XVII of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case