ATUL YADAVRAO BARAPATRE vs UNIVERSITY OF MUMBAI AND ORS. — WP/3894/2009
Case under Mah. Universities Act, 1994. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 07th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM010135212009
Next Hearing
18th June 2009
Filing Number
WP/9328/2009
Filing Date
09-04-2009
Registration No
WP/3894/2009
Registration Date
13-04-2009
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT BORKAR
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT BORKAR
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
07th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ATUL YADAVRAO BARAPATRE
Adv. Rishika Agarwal
Respondent(s)
UNIVERSITY OF MUMBAI AND ORS.
Adv. R. NO. 1,Rui Rodrigues 1123
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT BORKAR
URGENT ADMISSION
FOR CIRCULATION
FOR CIRCULATION
FOR CIRCULATION
FOR CIRCULATION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-06-2009 | URGENT ADMISSION |
| 30-04-2026 | FOR CIRCULATION |
| 18-03-2026 | FOR CIRCULATION |
| 11-03-2026 | FOR CIRCULATION |
| 09-11-2022 | FOR CIRCULATION |
Orders
Summary: Atul Yadavrao Barapatre v. University of Mumbai (WP/3894/2009) The Bombay High Court dismissed the petitioner's writ petition challenging his termination from University of Mumbai service. Barapatre was appointed in 1996 against a Scheduled Tribe reserved post, but a 1997 Caste Scrutiny Committee invalidated his caste claim, finding he belonged to the Koshti community (Special Backward Class). Though the University later absorbed him in the SBC quota in 2005, the State Government's 2007 directive rejected protection because his appointment postdated the 15 June 1995 cut-off date. The Court upheld termination, holding that administrative absorption cannot cure defects in an appointment based on a failed caste claim without legal authorization, and that subsequent absorption requires statutory sanction. The decision prioritized reservation policy compliance over equitable considerations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: Atul Yadavrao Barapatre v. University of Mumbai (WP/3894/2009) The Bombay High Court dismissed the petitioner's writ petition challenging his termination from University of Mumbai service. Barapatre was appointed in 1996 against a Scheduled Tribe reserved post, but a 1997 Caste Scrutiny Committee invalidated his caste claim, finding he belonged to the Koshti community (Special Backward Class). Though the University later absorbed him in the SBC quota in 2005, the State Government's 2007 directive rejected protection because his appointment postdated the 15 June 1995 cut-off date. The Court upheld termination, holding that administrative absorption cannot cure defects in an appointment based on a failed caste claim without legal authorization, and that subsequent absorption requires statutory sanction. The decision prioritized reservation policy compliance over equitable considerations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts