MALHARI KAMALYA KOLI SHRI. NISHIKANT PATIL, SHRI. DEEPAK A.PATIL vs KRISHNA NARAYAN GOPI AND ORS. — CAF/4494/2002

Case under Motor Vehicles Act,1939 Section 173. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.

Next hearing 16-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM010135012002

Filing Number

CAF/33242/2002

Filing Date

29-Aug-2002

Registration No

CAF/4494/2002

Registration Date

09-Dec-2002

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain

Bench Type

Single

Category

FIRST APPEAL ( 53 )

Sub-Category

MACP - Single Bench ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act,1939 Section 173

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MALHARI KAMALYA KOLI SHRI. NISHIKANT PATIL, SHRI. DEEPAK A.PATIL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KRISHNA NARAYAN GOPI AND ORS.

    Adv. R.NO. 6 SERVED 1123

  2. 2.MS. S. AMBIKA

  3. 3.M/S. NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY

  4. 4.MR MASHAUQUE KASIM SHAIKH

  5. 5.MOHAMMAD KASIM MOHAMMAD YASIN

  6. 6.M/S. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.

Case History

  1. 16-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 16-Jun-2026

    For Dismissal

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain

  3. 09-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal JainView PDF

    In Civil Application FA No. 4494/2002, the High Court of Bombay Appellate Side issued a Short Order (S.O.) on 9th June 2026 adjourning the matter to 16/06/2026 for dismissal. The applicant Malhari Kamalya Koli appeared without representation while the respondent was represented by counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 28-Mar-2011

    For Orders

    Registrar (Judicial - I)

  5. 07-Jan-2003

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 29-Aug-2002

    Case filed

    Registration No. CAF/4494/2002

casestatus.in Summary

In Civil Application FA No. 4494/2002, the High Court of Bombay Appellate Side issued a Short Order (S.O.) on 9th June 2026 adjourning the matter to 16/06/2026 for dismissal. The applicant Malhari Kamalya Koli appeared without representation while the respondent was represented by counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case