KAPIL DAULAT AWATE vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. ITS SECRETARY MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE AND ORS — HCBM10134312026
Case under Service Matter. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM010134312026
Next Hearing
16th June 2026
Filing Number
WP/7759/2026
Filing Date
17-03-2026
Judge
Shri. P. P. JADHAV, Registrar(Judl I)
Coram
Shri. P. P. JADHAV, Registrar(Judl I)
Bench Type
Division
Category
OTHER SERVICE MATTERS ( 66 )
Sub-Category
ALL OTHER SERVICE MATTERS - DB ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
KAPIL DAULAT AWATE
Adv. Avinash N Naikwadi
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. ITS SECRETARY MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE AND ORS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA DEPARTMENT OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT THROUGH ITS SECRETARY
DIRECTOR OF HEALTH SERVICES SAINT GEORGE HOSPITAL COMPOUND MUMBAI
THE DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER PUNE DIVISION PUNE
THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER ZILLA PARISHAD PUNE
Hearing History
Judge: Shri. P. P. JADHAV, Registrar(Judl I)
OBJECTIONS TO BE REMOVED
FOR ORDERS (OBJECTION NOT REMOVED)
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-04-2026 | OBJECTIONS TO BE REMOVED |
| 16-06-2026 | FOR ORDERS (OBJECTION NOT REMOVED) |
Orders
Summary: Writ Petition No. 7759 of 2026 filed by Kapil Daulat Awate against the State of Maharashtra was adjourned. The petitioner and advocate failed to remove office objections after notification on 17th April 2026. The Registrar (Judicial-I) granted an additional two weeks (excluding summer vacation) to cure the defects, with a warning that failure to do so will result in refusal of registration under Rule 3(iii) of Chapter XVII, Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: Writ Petition No. 7759 of 2026 filed by Kapil Daulat Awate against the State of Maharashtra was adjourned. The petitioner and advocate failed to remove office objections after notification on 17th April 2026. The Registrar (Judicial-I) granted an additional two weeks (excluding summer vacation) to cure the defects, with a warning that failure to do so will result in refusal of registration under Rule 3(iii) of Chapter XVII, Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts