KAPIL DAULAT AWATE vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. ITS SECRETARY MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE AND ORS — HCBM10134312026
Case under Service Matter. Status: For Orders (Objection Not Removed). Next hearing: 16th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM010134312026
Filing Number
WP/7759/2026
Filing Date
17-Mar-2026
Judge
Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)
Coram
Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)
Bench Type
Division
Category
OTHER SERVICE MATTERS ( 66 )
Sub-Category
ALL OTHER SERVICE MATTERS - DB ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 11-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KAPIL DAULAT AWATE
Adv. Avinash N Naikwadi
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. ITS SECRETARY MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE AND ORS
-
2.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA DEPARTMENT OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT THROUGH ITS SECRETARY
-
3.DIRECTOR OF HEALTH SERVICES SAINT GEORGE HOSPITAL COMPOUND MUMBAI
-
4.THE DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER PUNE DIVISION PUNE
-
5.THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER ZILLA PARISHAD PUNE
Case History
-
16-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
16-Jun-2026
For Orders (Objection Not Removed)
Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)
-
05-May-2026
Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)View PDF
Summary: Writ Petition No. 7759 of 2026 filed by Kapil Daulat Awate against the State of Maharashtra was adjourned. The petitioner and advocate failed to remove office objections after notification on 17th April 2026. The Registrar (Judicial-I) granted an additional two weeks (excluding summer vacation) to cure the defects, with a warning that failure to do so will result in refusal of registration under Rule 3(iii) of Chapter XVII, Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Mar-2026
Case filed
Summary: Writ Petition No. 7759 of 2026 filed by Kapil Daulat Awate against the State of Maharashtra was adjourned. The petitioner and advocate failed to remove office objections after notification on 17th April 2026. The Registrar (Judicial-I) granted an additional two weeks (excluding summer vacation) to cure the defects, with a warning that failure to do so will result in refusal of registration under Rule 3(iii) of Chapter XVII, Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts