FATESINH D PARMAR vs UNION OF INDIA AND ANR — HCBM10133852026

Case under Dadra and Nagar Haveli Land Reforms Regulation 1972 and Rules. Status: For Orders (Objection Not Removed). Next hearing: 19th June 2026.

For Orders (Objection Not Removed) Next hearing 19-Jun-2026 this date has passed

CNR: HCBM010133852026

Filing Number

WP/7734/2026

Filing Date

17-Mar-2026

Judge

Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)

Coram

Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)

Bench Type

Single

Category

LAND REVENUE CODE MATTERS ( 57 )

Sub-Category

Single Bench ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Dadra and Nagar Haveli Land Reforms Regulation 1972 and Rules

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.FATESINH D PARMAR

    Adv. Aditya A Joshi

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNION OF INDIA AND ANR

  2. 2.THE COLLECTOR DADRA AND NAGAR HAVELI

Case History

  1. 19-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 19-Jun-2026

    For Orders (Objection Not Removed)

    Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)

  3. 08-May-2026

    Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)View PDF

    Summary: The Bombay High Court's Registrar (Judicial-I) adjourned Fatesinh D Parmar's Writ Petition No. 7734 of 2026 against the Union of India and the Collector of Dadra and Nagar Haveli. The petition failed to remove office objections by the April 22, 2026 deadline. The Registrar granted a final two-week extension (excluding summer vacation) to cure the defects; failure to do so will result in refusal of registration under the applicable court rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 22-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 17-Mar-2026

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Bombay High Court's Registrar (Judicial-I) adjourned Fatesinh D Parmar's Writ Petition No. 7734 of 2026 against the Union of India and the Collector of Dadra and Nagar Haveli. The petition failed to remove office objections by the April 22, 2026 deadline. The Registrar granted a final two-week extension (excluding summer vacation) to cure the defects; failure to do so will result in refusal of registration under the applicable court rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case