ASHOK PANDURANG MORE vs KOJARANI ASHOK MORE THR. SHITAL ALIAS VAISHALI TANAJI KAMBLE — HCBM10133542026

Case under Family Court Act. Status: For Orders (Objection Not Removed). Next hearing: 16th June 2026.

For Orders (Objection Not Removed) Next hearing 16-Jun-2026 this date has passed

CNR: HCBM010133542026

Filing Number

WP/7711/2026

Filing Date

17-Mar-2026

Judge

Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)

Coram

Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)

Bench Type

Single

Category

FAMILY LAW ( 16 )

Sub-Category

RESTITUTION OF CONJUGAL RIGHTS ( 8 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Family Court Act

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ASHOK PANDURANG MORE

    Adv. Kuldeep U Nikam

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KOJARANI ASHOK MORE THR. SHITAL ALIAS VAISHALI TANAJI KAMBLE

Case History

  1. 16-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 16-Jun-2026

    For Orders (Objection Not Removed)

    Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)

  3. 05-May-2026

    Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)View PDF

    Case Summary: Writ Petition (Stamp) No. 7711 of 2026 filed by Ashok Pandurang More against Kojarani Ashok More (through Shital alias Vaishali Tanaji Kamble) was adjourned. The petitioner failed to remove office objections after being notified on 17th April 2026. The Registrar granted a further two weeks' time (excluding summer vacation) to remove the objections, warning that failure to do so will result in refusal of registration under Rule 3(iii) of Chapter XVII of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 17-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 17-Mar-2026

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Writ Petition (Stamp) No. 7711 of 2026 filed by Ashok Pandurang More against Kojarani Ashok More (through Shital alias Vaishali Tanaji Kamble) was adjourned. The petitioner failed to remove office objections after being notified on 17th April 2026. The Registrar granted a further two weeks' time (excluding summer vacation) to remove the objections, warning that failure to do so will result in refusal of registration under Rule 3(iii) of Chapter XVII of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case