M/S SIDDHIVINAYAK TRADERS THR.ITS PARTNER MR. NIKHIL RADHYESHYAM AGRAWAL vs THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER AND DY. COLLECTOR, GENERAL ADMINISTRATION — HCBM10132552026

Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 Section 37,1(C). Next hearing: 15th June 2026.

CNR: HCBM010132552026

Next Hearing

15th June 2026

Filing Number

ARA/7665/2026

Filing Date

16-03-2026

Judge

Dr.M.S. Deshpande, Registrar (Judicial - II)

Coram

Dr.M.S. Deshpande, Registrar (Judicial - II)

Bench Type

Single

Category

ARBITRATION ( 4 )

Sub-Category

Arbitration Appeals - Single Bench ( 106 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Acts & Sections

Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 Section 37,1(C)

Petitioner(s)

M/S SIDDHIVINAYAK TRADERS THR.ITS PARTNER MR. NIKHIL RADHYESHYAM AGRAWAL

Adv. Anushree Koparkar

Respondent(s)

THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER AND DY. COLLECTOR, GENERAL ADMINISTRATION

THE HIGHWAY AUTHORITY AND THE CHIEF ENGENEER,MAHARASHTRA STATE ROAD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD.

MAHARASHTRA STATE ROAD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD.

THE GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA

THE DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER NASHIK (STATUTORY ARBITRATOR)

Hearing History

Judge: Dr.M.S. Deshpande, Registrar (Judicial - II)

30-03-2026

FOR ORDERS (OBJECTION NOT REMOVED)

15-06-2026

FOR ORDERS (OBJECTION NOT REMOVED)

Orders

08-05-2026
Dr.M.S. Deshpande, Registrar (Judicial - II)

Case Summary: In Arbitration Appeal (Stamp) No. 7665 of 2026 before the Bombay High Court, the Registrar (Judicial) directed the appellant's advocate to remove office objections within 2 weeks as a final opportunity, excluding summer vacation. Failure to comply will result in refusal of registration of the Arbitration Appeal. The case was adjourned pending compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: In Arbitration Appeal (Stamp) No. 7665 of 2026 before the Bombay High Court, the Registrar (Judicial) directed the appellant's advocate to remove office objections within 2 weeks as a final opportunity, excluding summer vacation. Failure to comply will result in refusal of registration of the Arbitration Appeal. The case was adjourned pending compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case