M/S SIDDHIVINAYAK AGRO INDUSTRIES THROUGH ITS PARTNER MR. NIKHIL RADHESHYAM AGRAWAL vs THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER AND DY. COLLECTOR, GENERAL ADMINISTRATION — HCBM10132392026

Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 Section 37,1(C). Status: For Orders (Objection Not Removed). Next hearing: 15th June 2026.

For Orders (Objection Not Removed) Next hearing 15-Jun-2026 this date has passed

CNR: HCBM010132392026

Filing Number

ARA/7656/2026

Filing Date

16-Mar-2026

Judge

Dr.M.S. Deshpande, Registrar (Judicial - II)

Coram

Dr.M.S. Deshpande, Registrar (Judicial - II)

Bench Type

Single

Category

ARBITRATION ( 4 )

Sub-Category

Arbitration Appeals - Single Bench ( 106 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 Section 37,1(C)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S SIDDHIVINAYAK AGRO INDUSTRIES THROUGH ITS PARTNER MR. NIKHIL RADHESHYAM AGRAWAL

    Adv. Anushree Koparkar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER AND DY. COLLECTOR, GENERAL ADMINISTRATION

  2. 2.THE HIGHWAY AUTHORITY AND THE CHIEF ENGENEER,MAHARASHTRA STATE ROAD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD.

  3. 3.MAHARASHTRA STATE ROAD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD.

  4. 4.THE GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA

  5. 5.THE DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER NASHIK (STATUTORY ARBITRATOR)

Case History

  1. 15-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    For Orders (Objection Not Removed)

    Dr.M.S. Deshpande, Registrar (Judicial - II)

  3. 08-May-2026

    Dr.M.S. Deshpande, Registrar (Judicial - II)View PDF

    The case was adjourned. The Registrar directed the appellant's advocate to remove office objections within 2 weeks as a final opportunity, excluding summer vacation. Failure to comply will result in refusal of registration of the Arbitration Appeal and appropriate orders on the next date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 30-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

The case was adjourned. The Registrar directed the appellant's advocate to remove office objections within 2 weeks as a final opportunity, excluding summer vacation. Failure to comply will result in refusal of registration of the Arbitration Appeal and appropriate orders on the next date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case