MESSRS SIDDHIPRIYA BUILDCORP LLP THROUGH ITS PARTNER MR. NIKHIL RADHESHYAM AGRAWAL vs THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER AND DY COLLECTOR GENERAL ADMINISTRATION — HCBM10132352026

Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 Section 37,1(C). Next hearing: 15th June 2026.

CNR: HCBM010132352026

Next Hearing

15th June 2026

Filing Number

ARA/7655/2026

Filing Date

16-03-2026

Judge

Dr.M.S. Deshpande, Registrar (Judicial - II)

Coram

Dr.M.S. Deshpande, Registrar (Judicial - II)

Bench Type

Single

Category

ARBITRATION ( 4 )

Sub-Category

Arbitration Appeals - Single Bench ( 106 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Acts & Sections

Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 Section 37,1(C)

Petitioner(s)

MESSRS SIDDHIPRIYA BUILDCORP LLP THROUGH ITS PARTNER MR. NIKHIL RADHESHYAM AGRAWAL

Adv. Anushree Koparkar

Respondent(s)

THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER AND DY COLLECTOR GENERAL ADMINISTRATION

THE HIGHWAY AUTHORITY AND THE CHIEF ENGENEER,MAHARASHTRA STATE ROAD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD.

MAHARASHTRA STATE ROAD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD.

THE GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA

THE DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER NASHIK (STATUTORY ARBITRATOR)

Hearing History

Judge: Dr.M.S. Deshpande, Registrar (Judicial - II)

30-03-2026

FOR ORDERS (OBJECTION NOT REMOVED)

15-06-2026

FOR ORDERS (OBJECTION NOT REMOVED)

Orders

08-05-2026
Dr.M.S. Deshpande, Registrar (Judicial - II)

The Bombay High Court adjourned the Arbitration Appeal (Stamp) No. 7655 of 2026 filed by Messrs Siddhipriya Buildcorp LLP against the Land Acquisition Officer and Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation Ltd. The appellant's advocate was directed to remove office objections within two weeks as a final opportunity, with a warning that failure to do so would result in refusal of appeal registration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court adjourned the Arbitration Appeal (Stamp) No. 7655 of 2026 filed by Messrs Siddhipriya Buildcorp LLP against the Land Acquisition Officer and Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation Ltd. The appellant's advocate was directed to remove office objections within two weeks as a final opportunity, with a warning that failure to do so would result in refusal of appeal registration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case