THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED vs MRS. PREMICA ANIL PANDEY AND ORS. — CAF/12/2026
Case under Motor Vehicles Act,1939 Section 173. Next hearing: 16th July 2026.
CNR: HCBM010131832017
Filing Number
CAF/8310/2017
Filing Date
21-Mar-2017
Registration No
CAF/12/2026
Registration Date
23-Apr-2026
Judge
Dr.M.S. Deshpande, Registrar (Judicial - II)
Coram
Dr.M.S. Deshpande, Registrar (Judicial - II)
Bench Type
Single
Category
FIRST APPEAL ( 53 )
Sub-Category
MACP - Single Bench ( 4 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 11-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED
Adv. poonam mital
Respondent(s)
-
1.MRS. PREMICA ANIL PANDEY AND ORS.
-
2.KUM. PREETI ANIL PANDEY (MINOR) THROUGH MOTHER AND NEXT FRIEND MRS. PREMICA A. PANDEY
-
3.SHRI. MATAPRASAD M. PANDEY
-
4.MRS. SUSHILA MATAPRASAD PANDEY
-
5.MS. PRIYANKA @ GYANTI M. PANDEY (MINOR) THROUGH FATHER AND NEXT FRIEND SHRI. MATAPRASAD M. PANDEY
-
6.MR. SAMEER SATISH PATIL
Case History
-
16-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
16-Jul-2026
For Orders (Regular)
Dr.M.S. Deshpande, Registrar (Judicial - II)
-
07-May-2026
Dr.M.S. Deshpande, Registrar (Judicial - II)View PDF
Case Summary: CAF/12/2026 Outcome: Civil Application No. 12 of 2026 for substituted service was allowed. The Bombay High Court granted Oriental Insurance Company Limited permission to serve respondents via substituted service through newspaper publication, as original notices were returned unserved. The applicant's advocate was directed to obtain and publish the notice within specified timelines, with the case returnable in 10 weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-May-2026
For Orders (Regular)
Dr.M.S. Deshpande, Registrar (Judicial - II)
-
21-Mar-2017
Case filed
Registration No. CAF/12/2026
-
12-Dec-1212
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
Case Summary: CAF/12/2026 Outcome: Civil Application No. 12 of 2026 for substituted service was allowed. The Bombay High Court granted Oriental Insurance Company Limited permission to serve respondents via substituted service through newspaper publication, as original notices were returned unserved. The applicant's advocate was directed to obtain and publish the notice within specified timelines, with the case returnable in 10 weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts