SD SVP NAGAR REDEVELOPMENT PVT LTD Wadia Ghandy and Co. vs ASHRAFUZ ZAMAN SHAIKH — IA/3363/2026

Case under C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 100. Disposed: --Disposed Off on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM010131622026

e-Filing Number

12-03-2026

Filing Number

IA/7619/2026

Filing Date

16-Mar-2026

Registration No

IA/3363/2026

Registration Date

29-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar

Bench Type

Single

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )

Sub-Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 11 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--Disposed Off

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 100

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SD SVP NAGAR REDEVELOPMENT PVT LTD Wadia Ghandy and Co.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ASHRAFUZ ZAMAN SHAIKH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. JamadarView PDF

    Case Summary: IA/3363/2026 The Bombay High Court granted SD SVP Nagar Redevelopment Pvt. Ltd.'s application to condone a 17-day delay in filing a Second Appeal against a Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate Tribunal order dated 21st August 2025. The court found the applicant's reasons for delay—including delayed receipt of the reasoned order and corporate restructuring—were sustainable and not indicative of negligence or mala fide, prioritizing substantive justice over procedural technicalities. The delay was condoned subject to payment of Rs. 15,000 costs to the respondent within two weeks, after which the Second Appeal would be registered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. IA/3363/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: IA/3363/2026 The Bombay High Court granted SD SVP Nagar Redevelopment Pvt. Ltd.'s application to condone a 17-day delay in filing a Second Appeal against a Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate Tribunal order dated 21st August 2025. The court found the applicant's reasons for delay—including delayed receipt of the reasoned order and corporate restructuring—were sustainable and not indicative of negligence or mala fide, prioritizing substantive justice over procedural technicalities. The delay was condoned subject to payment of Rs. 15,000 costs to the respondent within two weeks, after which the Second Appeal would be registered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case